Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3591 - 3600 of 12359 results
Riemers v. Jaeger
2013 ND 30
Highlight: A party seeking writs of mandamus, prohibition, or injunction must demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief requested. |
Hageman v. Hageman
2013 ND 29
Highlight: A district court's decision to modify primary residential responsibility is a finding of fact, subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. |
Morrow v. Ziegler
2013 ND 28
Highlight: The requirement that an officer include his or her observation that a driver's body contained alcohol on the report and notice is basic and mandatory for the Department of Transportation to have authority to suspend the driver's license for refusal to submit to an onsite screening test. |
Burgard v. Burgard
2013 ND 27
Highlight: A motion made under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is the exclusive remedial procedure to set aside a default judgment. |
Matter of J.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-ref. w/20100366)
2013 ND 26 Highlight: Whether an individual engaged in sexually predatory conduct is barred by res judicata from being relitigated on a petition for discharge. |
Dahl v. State (Consolidated w/20120211)(Cross-reference w/20090262)
2013 ND 25
Highlight: The district court has discretion in deciding whether to grant a defendant's request for a bifurcated trial in a case in which there is an issue of lack of criminal responsibility. |
Olson, et al. v. Job Service, et al.
2013 ND 24 Highlight: The phrase "a claimant's work stoppage dispute of any kind" in N.D.C.C. 52-06-02(4) refers to employee-initiated work stoppages, and an employer's lockout of its employees as a result of a labor dispute is not an employee-initiated work stoppage. |
State v. Kusy
2013 ND 23 Highlight: A criminal judgment for luring a minor by computer and for sexual assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
State v. Flah
2013 ND 22 Highlight: A district court judgment of conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia after a jury trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
In the Matter of Finstad (CONFIDENTIAL)
2013 ND 21 Highlight: Transferred to incapacity to practice law status. |