Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4611 - 4620 of 12418 results
State v. Steen (Consolidated w/20080244 thru 20080247)
2009 ND 30 Highlight: A district court order denying defendant's motions for credit for time spent in custody is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Delzer, et al. v. Anderson
2009 ND 29 Highlight: Civil money judgment relating to assigned divorce debt summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (6). |
State v. Isom (Consolidated w/20080311-20080314)
2009 ND 28 Highlight: The district court's order denying defendant's motion for credit for time served is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Reciprocal Discipline of Swensen
2009 ND 27 Highlight: Lawyer disbarred. |
Reciprocal Discipline of Hellerud
2009 ND 26 Highlight: Suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Interest of R.M. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2009 ND 25 Highlight: Mental health commitment and involuntary medication order summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
Collection Specialist Int'l v. McLaughlin Const. Co. (Cons. w/20080242)
2009 ND 24 Highlight: District court judgment in favor of McLaughlin Construction Co. in a contract case is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Bruder v. WSI, et al.
2009 ND 23 Highlight: When there are conflicting expert medical opinions about the cause of a workers compensation claimant's medical condition, Workforce Safety and Insurance has the responsibility to weigh credibility and resolve conflicts in the evidence. |
Midthun v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
2009 ND 22
Highlight: A party appealing a hearing officer's decision must file reasonably specific specifications of error detailing which matters are at issue, so as to alert the agency, other parties, and the court of the particular errors claimed. |
Adoption of J.D.F. (Confidential)
2009 ND 21 Highlight: A district court must advise parents that they are entitled to representation by counsel, provided by the State if necessary, throughout any proceedings to terminate the parent-child relationship against their will. |