Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4691 - 4700 of 12418 results
State v. Wetzel
2008 ND 186
Highlight: Words of a statute are given their plain, ordinary, and commonly understood meaning. |
Matter of R.A.S. (Confidential)
2008 ND 185
Highlight: A court must make sufficient factual findings to provide the appellate court with the basis for the court's decision. |
Public Service Commission v. Minnesota Grain
2008 ND 184
Highlight: On legal questions, such as interpretation of a statute, an agency's decision is fully reviewable on appeal. |
Brown v. Brodell, et al.
2008 ND 183
Highlight: Findings of fact in cases involving the doctrine of acquiescence are reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard. |
ND State Electrical Board v. Boren
2008 ND 182
Highlight: The right of appeal is governed solely by statute in this state, and if there is no statutory basis to hear an appeal, the appeal must be dismissed. |
House v. Royer, et al.
2008 ND 181 Highlight: Judgment of eviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Bolinske v. Jaeger, et al.
2008 ND 180
Highlight: A writ of mandamus may be issued to compel the performance of an act which the law specifically requires a state official to perform. |
Tarnavsky v. Tarnavsky, et al.
2008 ND 179 Highlight: Orders denying motions to "Quash Garnishment Summons," to "Expunge Order Denying Motion to Quash Garnishment Summons," to "Deny Order Confirming Sale," to amend findings under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(b), for "Extra Ordinary Relief," and for relief from the judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (2), and (4). |
Drayton v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al.
2008 ND 178
Highlight: Courts are more circumspect about applying administrative res judicata than judicial res judicata, taking into account (1) the subject matter decided by the administrative agency, (2) the purpose of the administrative action, and (3) the reasons for the proceeding. |
Disciplinary Board v. Tollefson
2008 ND 177 Highlight: Suspension of lawyer ordered. |