Opinions

Hoover v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Transportation 2008 ND 87
Docket No.: 20070258
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Eyewitness testimony is not necessary to establish reasonable grounds to believe a person was driving under the influence; circumstantial evidence is sufficient.
If a police officer has probable cause to arrest a suspect, the officer has the right to accompany and monitor the movements of the suspect.

Interest of T.E. (Confidential) 2008 ND 86
Docket No.: 20080034
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court must to make all four factual findings in an involuntary medication order, whether the involuntary medication order is included as part of the larger commitment order or when a medication order is issued separately.

Ike v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Transportation 2008 ND 85
Docket No.: 20070302
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The issuance of a temporary operator's permit to a driver having an alcohol concentration exceeding the per se limit is a basic and mandatory requirement under N.D.C.C. 39-20-03.1. The issuance of the permit serves as the Department's official notification to the driver of the Department's intent to revoke, suspend, or deny driving privileges.
An officer's error as to a provision that is not basic and mandatory to the Department's authority to proceed is not reversible when there is no prejudice.

State v. Gay 2008 ND 84
Docket No.: 20070348
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under the Fourth Amendment, a seizure occurs whenever an officer stops an individual and restrains his freedom, and that seizure must be reasonable.
A search, under the Fourth Amendment, occurs when the government intrudes upon an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy.
A pat-down search is not simply a routine preliminary to a more extensive search.
The exclusionary rule prohibits the admission of physical and testimonial evidence gathered illegally.

State v. Vaagen 2008 ND 83
Docket No.: 20070337
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author:

Highlight: A criminal conviction of failure to pay child support is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Feist 2008 ND 82
Docket No.: 20070305
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author:

Highlight: A criminal judgment for fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3) and (4).

Interest of C.J., S.J., and K.W. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20070315) 2008 ND 81
Docket No.: 20070314
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Juvenile Law
Author:

Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

Ward, et al. v. Bullis, et al. 2008 ND 80
Docket No.: 20070188
Filing Date: 4/25/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: An attorney may be liable for securities law violations if he is an agent who effects or attempts to effect the purchase or sale of securities, and he aids or participates in any way in the sale or contract for sale made in violation of the Securities Act.
Summary judgment is appropriate when either party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and no dispute exists as to either the material facts or the inferences to be drawn from undisputed facts, or resolving the factual disputes would not alter the result.

Manske v. Workforce Safety and Insurance 2008 ND 79
Docket No.: 20070173
Filing Date: 4/23/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A worker's employment need not be the sole cause of injury to be compensable. It is sufficient if a work condition is a substantial contributing factor to the disease.
The fact that an employee may have physical conditions or personal habits which make him or her more prone to such an injury does not constitute a sufficient reason for denying a claim.

Haugenoe v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al. 2008 ND 78
Docket No.: 20070099
Filing Date: 4/22/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Section 65-01-09, N.D.C.C., does not grant WSI a subrogation interest in an injured worker's legal malpractice claim against an attorney who committed malpractice in handling the injured worker's claim against a third-party tortfeasor.