Opinions

Lagerquist v. Stergo, et al. 2008 ND 138
Docket No.: 20070285
Filing Date: 7/2/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Agency is generally a question of fact.
Agency is never presumed, and if an agency relationship is denied, the party alleging agency must establish it by clear and convincing evidence.
On appeal, a finding of agency is reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.
An agency relationship is created when one person, called the principal, authorizes another, called the agent, to act for the principal in dealing with third persons. Agency is either actual or ostensible.
Agency cannot be proved by showing the declarations of the alleged agent.

State v. Torkelsen (Consolidated w/20070372 & 20070373) 2008 ND 137
Docket No.: 20070369
Filing Date: 7/2/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author:

Highlight: Sexual assault convictions are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), the convictions are supported by substantial evidence.

Gerhardt, et al. v. C.K. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2008 ND 136
Docket No.: 20070282
Filing Date: 6/30/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Paternity
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A proceeding to adjudicate parentage commenced before the effective date of the 2005 version of the Uniform Parentage Act is governed by the law in effect at the time the proceeding was commenced.
Section 14-17-10(1), N.D.C.C. (1993), does not require the court to compel genetic tests in response to a post-judgment motion.

State v. Blunt 2008 ND 135
Docket No.: 20070247
Filing Date: 6/30/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Personal benefit to the defendant is not an element of the crime of misapplication of entrusted property.
At a preliminary hearing in a criminal case, the State is not required to prove with absolute certainty or beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime occurred, but need only produce sufficient evidence to establish probable cause that a crime occurred and that the defendant committed it.
The district court may consider credibility of witnesses at a preliminary hearing only when, as a matter of law, the testimony is implausible or incredible. When there is a mere conflict in the testimony, a question of fact exists for the jury, and the judge must draw the inference favorable to the prosecution.
A "bonus" is a premium paid in addition to what is due or expected, or a payment in addition to or in excess of the compensation that would ordinarily be given.

State v. Coppage 2008 ND 134
Docket No.: 20070304
Filing Date: 6/26/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A motion for a new trial not based on newly discovered evidence must be filed within ten days of the verdict under N.D.R.Crim.P. 33.
A jury verdict convicting a defendant of both attempted murder and aggravated assault is not legally inconsistent.
Aggravated assault is not a lesser-included offense of attempted murder, except under subsection 4 of section 12.1-17-02, N.D.C.C.
Unchallenged jury instructions become the law of the case.
A criminal defendant's actions need not result in a potentially fatal injury in order for the defendant to be convicted of attempted murder under N.D.C.C. 12.1-16-01(1)(b).

Sambursky v. State (CON w/20070178 thru 20070182) (Cross-Ref w/20050330-335) 2008 ND 133
Docket No.: 20070177
Filing Date: 6/26/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel has a heavy burden of proving (1) counsel's representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) the defendant was prejudiced by counsel's deficient performance.
Whether a petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact and is fully reviewable on appeal.

Barros v. ND Dept. of Transportation 2008 ND 132
Docket No.: 20080066
Filing Date: 6/26/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The Department of Transportation is not required to call all persons who have handled a blood sample to establish a chain of custody for the sample. To establish chain of custody and introduce the results of a blood test, the Department's must show that the sample tested is the same one originally drawn from the defendant.

Interest of K.L. and M.S. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20070310) 2008 ND 131
Docket No.: 20070309
Filing Date: 6/26/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Juvenile Law
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A juvenile court's decision to terminate parental rights is a question of fact that will not be overturned unless the decision is clearly erroneous.
The State cannot rely on past deprivation alone, but must provide prognostic evidence, Ademonstrating the deprivation will continue.
A claim for ineffective assistance of counsel in termination proceedings is recognized, but the necessary evidence of the claim must appear on the face of the record and a case will not be remanded for the purpose of developing a record to support the claim.

Matter of E.W.F. (Confidential) 2008 ND 130
Docket No.: 20080037
Filing Date: 6/26/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Civil commitments of sexually dangerous individuals are reviewed under a modified clearly erroneous standard and will be affirmed unless the district court's order is induced by an erroneous view of the law, or we are firmly convinced the order is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.
In addition to the three requirements contained in the plain language of the statute governing sexually dangerous individual commitments, substantive due process rights require the individual facing commitment must be shown to have serious difficulty controlling his behavior.
In a civil proceeding, a party's failure to offer evidence refuting or otherwise explaining the opposing party's witness testimony warrants the inference that the opposing party's witness's statements were true and correct.

Laib v. Laib 2008 ND 129
Docket No.: 20070079
Filing Date: 6/26/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: When the district court in a divorce proceeding has made specific findings that the domestic violence presumption against an award of custody has been triggered and the perpetrator has failed to rebut the presumption, the court may not later change custody to the perpetrator unless the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the presumption has been rebutted.
A motion for relief from a judgment is not a substitute for an appeal.