Opinions

State v. Desjarlais (Consolidated w/20070157) 2008 ND 13
Docket No.: 20070156
Filing Date: 1/22/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: There is no obvious error under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b) unless there is a clear deviation from a clearly established rule of law.

Van Sickle, et al. v. Hallmark & Assoc., Inc., et al. 2008 ND 12
Docket No.: 20070154
Filing Date: 1/22/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A debt cannot be discharged in bankruptcy unless the creditor received notice of the bankruptcy proceedings.
State and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction to decide whether a creditor's claim has been discharged in a bankruptcy proceeding if the creditor claims he did not have notice or actual knowledge of the bankruptcy proceeding.
Claims for conversion and breach of contract may arise under the same facts if the defendant's conduct would give rise to liability independent of the fact that a contract exists between the parties.
A claim for tortious interference ordinarily requires a showing that a person who is not a party to the contract interfered with the contract.
The Supreme Court does not issue advisory opinions.

Koble v. Koble 2008 ND 11
Docket No.: 20070198
Filing Date: 1/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Leno v. Department of Transportation 2008 ND 10
Docket No.: 20070213
Filing Date: 1/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The Department is not required to show an Intoxilyzer machine has been recalibrated following a movement of the machine to prove an Intoxilyzer test was fairly administered.
An agency's decision will be affirmed if its findings of fact are supported by a preponderance of the evidence. When deciding whether a preponderance of the evidence supports an agency's findings, we do not re-weigh the evidence or substitute our judgment for that of the agency.

Interest of J.S., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2008 ND 9
Docket No.: 20070123
Filing Date: 1/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Kourajian v. Kourajian 2008 ND 8
Docket No.: 20070175
Filing Date: 1/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A party seeking custody modification under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.6(4) is entitled to an evidentiary hearing if the party brings a prima facie case, by alleging, with supporting affidavits, sufficient facts which, if uncontradicted, would support a custody modification in favor of that party.
The purpose of the prima facie case requirement in N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.6(4) is to avoid holding custody modification hearings based on mere allegations alone.

City of Minot v. Boger, et al. (Cross-reference w/ 20060163) 2008 ND 7
Docket No.: 20070158
Filing Date: 1/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The due process clauses of the federal and state constitutions are not violated under the void-for-vagueness doctrine if the challenged language, when measured by common understanding and practice, gives adequate warning of the conduct proscribed and marks boundaries sufficiently distinct for fair administration of the law.
A local government has a substantial interest in aesthetics and has the right to maintain its aesthetics through zoning regulations.

Overland v. Overland 2008 ND 6
Docket No.: 20070070
Filing Date: 1/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A district court's division of property does not need to be equal to be equitable, but any substantial disparity must be explained.
When awarding spousal support, a district court must consider the relevant factors under the Ruff-Fischer guidelines. A court must also consider the needs of the spouse seeking support and of the supporting spouse's needs and ability to pay.

City of Grand Forks v. Mitchell 2008 ND 5
Docket No.: 20070153
Filing Date: 1/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A police officer's stop of a vehicle bearing no license plates with a white 8 ? x 11 sheet of paper with a date written in black marker posted in its rear window that the officer did not recognize as an authentic temporary registration certificate was constitutionally permissible because the officer had reasonable and articulable suspicion of a violation of the motor vehicle registration law.
A police officer's subjective intent is not germane for purposes of the objective inquiry used to determine whether a reasonable and articulable suspicion existed that an individual was violating the law.

State v. Wegley 2008 ND 4
Docket No.: 20070027
Filing Date: 1/17/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Even if a defendant objects to hearsay testimony about a child's out-of-court statement at a pre-trial hearing, the defendant's failure to object at trial limits review to determining whether the admission of that testimony into evidence constitutes obvious error affecting substantial rights.
To establish obvious error, a defendant must show error that is plain and affects substantial rights, and to affect substantial rights a plain error must have been prejudicial, or have affected the outcome of the proceeding.
Nonverbal conduct is a statement under the hearsay rules if the nonverbal conduct was intended as an assertion.
A declarant's out-of-court statement is not hearsay if the declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is consistent with the declarant's testimony and is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.