Opinions

Ike v. Director, N.D. Dept. of Transportation 2008 ND 85
Docket No.: 20070302
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The issuance of a temporary operator's permit to a driver having an alcohol concentration exceeding the per se limit is a basic and mandatory requirement under N.D.C.C. 39-20-03.1. The issuance of the permit serves as the Department's official notification to the driver of the Department's intent to revoke, suspend, or deny driving privileges.
An officer's error as to a provision that is not basic and mandatory to the Department's authority to proceed is not reversible when there is no prejudice.

State v. Gay 2008 ND 84
Docket No.: 20070348
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under the Fourth Amendment, a seizure occurs whenever an officer stops an individual and restrains his freedom, and that seizure must be reasonable.
A search, under the Fourth Amendment, occurs when the government intrudes upon an individual's reasonable expectation of privacy.
A pat-down search is not simply a routine preliminary to a more extensive search.
The exclusionary rule prohibits the admission of physical and testimonial evidence gathered illegally.

State v. Vaagen 2008 ND 83
Docket No.: 20070337
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author:

Highlight: A criminal conviction of failure to pay child support is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Feist 2008 ND 82
Docket No.: 20070305
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author:

Highlight: A criminal judgment for fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (3) and (4).

Interest of C.J., S.J., and K.W. (CONFIDENTIAL) (consolidated w/20070315) 2008 ND 81
Docket No.: 20070314
Filing Date: 5/15/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Juvenile Law
Author:

Highlight: A juvenile court judgment terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

Ward, et al. v. Bullis, et al. 2008 ND 80
Docket No.: 20070188
Filing Date: 4/25/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: An attorney may be liable for securities law violations if he is an agent who effects or attempts to effect the purchase or sale of securities, and he aids or participates in any way in the sale or contract for sale made in violation of the Securities Act.
Summary judgment is appropriate when either party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law and no dispute exists as to either the material facts or the inferences to be drawn from undisputed facts, or resolving the factual disputes would not alter the result.

Manske v. Workforce Safety and Insurance 2008 ND 79
Docket No.: 20070173
Filing Date: 4/23/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A worker's employment need not be the sole cause of injury to be compensable. It is sufficient if a work condition is a substantial contributing factor to the disease.
The fact that an employee may have physical conditions or personal habits which make him or her more prone to such an injury does not constitute a sufficient reason for denying a claim.

Haugenoe v. Workforce Safety and Insurance, et al. 2008 ND 78
Docket No.: 20070099
Filing Date: 4/22/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Section 65-01-09, N.D.C.C., does not grant WSI a subrogation interest in an injured worker's legal malpractice claim against an attorney who committed malpractice in handling the injured worker's claim against a third-party tortfeasor.

Sandvick, et al. v. LaCrosse, et al. 2008 ND 77
Docket No.: 20070146
Filing Date: 4/18/2008
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Oil, Gas and Minerals
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The crucial elements of a partnership are (1) an intention to be partners, (2) co-ownership of the business, and (3) a profit motive.
For a business enterprise to constitute a joint venture, the following four elements must be present: (1) contribution by the parties of money, property, time, or skill in some common undertaking, but the contributions need not be equal or of the same nature; (2) a proprietary interest and right of mutual control over the engaged property; (3) an express or implied agreement for the sharing of profits, and usually, but not necessarily, of losses; and (4) an express or implied contract showing a joint venture was formed. There is, however, no fixed formula for identifying the joint venture relationship in all cases, and each case will depend upon its own unique facts.
Principles of partnership law apply to the joint venture relationship.
Joint venturers, like copartners, owe to one another, while the enterprise continues, the duty of the finest loyalty.

Disciplinary Board v. O'Donnell (Consolidated w/ 20080085) 2008 ND 76
Docket No.: 20080084
Filing Date: 4/18/2008
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer is suspended from the practice of law for two years, but the suspension is stayed for two years on conditions. Interim suspension is vacated.