Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4871 - 4880 of 12382 results
Hawes v. ND Department of Transportation (consolidated w/20070060)
2007 ND 177
Highlight: That the defendant's vehicle is out of gas does not render the vehicle inoperable as a matter of law. |
State v. Jacobs
2007 ND 176 Highlight: Amended criminal judgment for possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Mountrail Bethel Home v. Lovdahl (Cross-reference w/ 20060002)
2007 ND 175 Highlight: Judgment finding enforceable contract did not exist is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Skarsgard (Consolidated w/20070084)
2007 ND 174 Highlight: Criminal judgments for driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a suspended license are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4), and (7). |
State v. Thompson (Consolidated w/20070143)
2007 ND 173 Highlight: An order revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Oie v. State
2007 ND 172 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. $2996.00 U.S. Currency
2007 ND 171 Highlight: Order granting forfeiture of $2996.00 is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Disciplinary Board v. Light
2007 ND 170 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Rodenbiker v. Workforce Safety and Insurance
2007 ND 169
Highlight: Section 65-05-10, N.D.C.C., does not provide for an award of partial disability benefits when an injured worker cannot be returned to substantial gainful employment as defined under N.D.C.C. 65-05.1-01(3), and does not have a retained earnings capacity to meet the income test of N.D.C.C. 65-05.1-01(6)(a)(3). |
Bertsch v. Bertsch
2007 ND 168
Highlight: The law of the case doctrine applies only to issues decided by final judgments. |