Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
4911 - 4920 of 12428 results
Intercept Corp. v. Calima Financial LLC, et al.
2007 ND 180
Highlight: The corporate veil of a limited liability company may be pierced if the same conditions and circumstances under which the corporate veil of a corporation may be pierced under North Dakota law are present. |
Axtmann, et al. v. Chillemi, et al.
2007 ND 179
Highlight: The officers and directors of a corporation generally are not liable for the ordinary debts of the corporation, but a corporation's corporate veil may be disregarded when the corporation has insufficient capitalization for purposes of the corporate undertaking. |
State v. McAvoy
2007 ND 178
Highlight: Conditions of probation are interpreted as mandatory. |
Hawes v. ND Department of Transportation (consolidated w/20070060)
2007 ND 177
Highlight: That the defendant's vehicle is out of gas does not render the vehicle inoperable as a matter of law. |
State v. Jacobs
2007 ND 176 Highlight: Amended criminal judgment for possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Mountrail Bethel Home v. Lovdahl (Cross-reference w/ 20060002)
2007 ND 175 Highlight: Judgment finding enforceable contract did not exist is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Skarsgard (Consolidated w/20070084)
2007 ND 174 Highlight: Criminal judgments for driving under the influence of alcohol and driving with a suspended license are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4), and (7). |
State v. Thompson (Consolidated w/20070143)
2007 ND 173 Highlight: An order revoking probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Oie v. State
2007 ND 172 Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. $2996.00 U.S. Currency
2007 ND 171 Highlight: Order granting forfeiture of $2996.00 is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |