Opinions

State v. Silbernagel 2007 ND 97
Docket No.: 20070007
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of motion to suppress evidence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

Moore v. State 2007 ND 96
Docket No.: 20060224
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Post-conviction relief may be granted when "[e]vidence, not previously presented and heard, exists requiring vacation of the conviction or sentence in the interest of justice."
When a defendant applies for post-conviction relief to withdraw a guilty plea, the application is treated as one made under N.D.R.Crim.P. 32(d), and withdrawal is allowed when necessary to correct a manifest injustice.

Interest of C.R., a child CONFIDENTIAL 2007 ND 95
Docket No.: 20070017
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order terminating parental rights summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

City of Minot v. Holbach 2007 ND 94
Docket No.: 20070042
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction of criminal trespass is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

State v. Enno 2007 ND 93
Docket No.: 20060273
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A judgment entered after a jury convicted the defendant of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

Hernandez v. State 2007 ND 92
Docket No.: 20070051
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

Olsrud v. Bismarck-Mandan Orchestral Association 2007 ND 91
Docket No.: 20060239
Filing Date: 6/12/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: N.D.R.Civ.P. 5 applies to pleadings after the original complaint is served and the court acquires personal jurisdiction over the defendant, while N.D.R.Civ.P. 4 applies to a court's exercise of personal jurisdiction over a defendant and how service of process may be made.
A plaintiff has the burden of establishing that authority to receive service of process exists between a defendant and the individual served.
A party waives an argument by not providing supporting argument, and without supporting reasoning or citation to relevant authorities, an argument is without merit.

State ex rel. Stenehjem v. Philip Morris Inc., et al. (consol. w/20060213) 2007 ND 90
Docket No.: 20060207
Filing Date: 6/7/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from the denial of a motion to compel arbitration, unless the district court's decision was based on factual findings, in which case the clearly erroneous standard applies.
Use of the words, "including, without limitation," reflects a contrary intention that an enumeration is not exhaustive, rendering the doctrine of ejusdem generis inapplicable.
The plain and unambiguous language of the tobacco master settlement agreement requires arbitration of a dispute over application of the diligent enforcement exemption to the non-participating manufacturer adjustment.

State v. Falconer 2007 ND 89
Docket No.: 20060210
Filing Date: 6/7/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A defendant is entitled to a self-defense jury instruction if there is evidence to support it.
A defendant does not have standing to challenge a grant of immunity to another person.
An accomplice's testimony must be corroborated by independent evidence that tends to connect the defendant with the crime.

D.G.L. Trading Corp. v. Reis 2007 ND 88
Docket No.: 20070052
Filing Date: 6/7/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: The general rule that questions not raised before the district court will not be considered on appeal cannot be applied so narrowly as to affirm erroneous or incomplete applications of law in favor of judicial expediency.
U.C.C. provisions allow parties to make separate contracts regarding the return terms and risk of loss.