Opinions

Estate of Stave 2007 ND 53
Docket No.: 20060189
Filing Date: 4/10/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: In a proceeding to contest a will, four elements must be proven to establish undue influence: 1) a testator subject to undue influence; 2) the existence of the opportunity to exercise undue influence; 3) a disposition to exercise undue influence; and 4) a result that appears to be the effect of undue influence.
For the issue of undue influence to be submitted to a jury, the evidence must be sufficient with regard to each essential element of the claim and the evidence must also create more than just a mere suspicion of undue activity.

State v. Westmiller 2007 ND 52
Docket No.: 20060246
Filing Date: 4/10/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Although reasonable suspicion is the minimum quantum of evidence required for an investigatory traffic stop, a stop may be upheld on the basis of probable cause if that evidentiary standard has been satisfied.
Traffic violations, even if considered common or minor, constitute prohibited conduct and therefore provide officers with the basis for an investigatory stops.

Odden v. Rath 2007 ND 51
Docket No.: 20060170
Filing Date: 4/10/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: To obtain an extension of a protection order, the petitioner need not make a second showing of actual or imminent domestic violence. However, the petitioner must meet the threshold burden of showing actual or imminent domestic violence at some point prior to obtaining the extension.
Although the district court should not extend a protection order based solely on the history between the parties, it remains a relevant factor to consider when determining whether an extension is warranted.
A petitioner's fear alone, with no other supporting facts, is not enough to justify the extension of a protection order.

Matter of Anderson 2007 ND 50
Docket No.: 20060088
Filing Date: 4/10/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The district court may extend for good cause the 60-day period within which a commitment hearing must be held.
For the civil commitment proceedings under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3, the legislature specifically excluded the right to a jury trial.
Involuntary civil commitment of a sexually dangerous person is reviewed under a modified clearly erroneous standard of review.
Sexually predatory conduct includes the act of compelling another to submit to sexual contact by force. It also includes sexual contact with a minor when the actor is an adult.
A person need not be diagnosed with a sexual disorder. The actor need only have a congenital or acquired condition that is manifested by a personality disorder or other mental disorder or dysfunction.
Under the statute for committing a sexually dangerous person, proof of a nexus between the requisite disorder and dangerousness encompasses proof that the disorder involves serious difficulty in controlling behavior and suffices to distinguish a dangerous sexual offender whose disorder subjects him to civil commitment from the dangerous but typical recidivist in a criminal case.

Lorenz v. Lorenz 2007 ND 49
Docket No.: 20060068
Filing Date: 4/10/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: In determining the value of the parties' marital estate, a district court must include all the parties' assets and debts in the marital estate.
A substantial disparity in the property distribution must be explained.
A district court's findings of fact must be sufficient to allow a reviewing court to understand the basis for the district court's decision.
The decision whether to award spousal support is a finding of fact and will not be reversed on appeal unless it is clearly erroneous.

City of West Fargo v. Olson 2007 ND 48
Docket No.: 20060325
Filing Date: 4/10/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A conviction for driving under the influence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

State v. Bovkoon 2007 ND 47
Docket No.: 20060312
Filing Date: 4/10/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Conviction for livestock running at large is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Gratech Co., Ltd. v. Wold Engineering, P.C. (Cross-Ref. w/20030181) 2007 ND 46
Docket No.: 20060272
Filing Date: 3/27/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: An arbitration award is vacated only if it is completely irrational, in that the decision is either mistaken on its face or so mistaken as to result in real injustice or constructive fraud. An arbitrator's mistake as to fact or law is not a sufficient ground for overturning an arbitration award.
A successful litigant is not entitled to attorney's fees unless they are expressly authorized by statute or by agreement of the parties.
When no evidence is introduced and when the district court makes no specific findings of fact to support its determination on attorney's fees, it is impossible for the Supreme Court on appeal to appropriately review the decision of the district court.

State v. Frohlich 2007 ND 45
Docket No.: 20060178
Filing Date: 3/22/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Motions for continuance will be granted only for good cause shown, either by affidavit or otherwise.
The denial of a continuance will be reversed only if it is an abuse of discretion.
When a continuance is sought to retain or replace counsel, the right to select counsel must be carefully balanced against the public's interest in the orderly administration of justice. In exercising its discretion, the district court may consider the time required for trial preparation and the diligence of the moving party.
Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
Cumulative evidence is additional evidence of the same character as existing evidence and that supports a fact established by the existing evidence.

City of Belfield v. Kilkenny 2007 ND 44
Docket No.: 20060176
Filing Date: 3/22/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Violation of City Ordinance
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: All laws must meet two requirements to survive a void-for-vagueness challenge: the law must create minimum guidelines for the reasonable police officer, judge, or jury charged with enforcement of the statute; and the law must provide a reasonable person with adequate and fair warning of the proscribed conduct.