Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5171 - 5180 of 12382 results
Interest of N.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2006 ND 132 Highlight: Juvenile court order declaring child delinquent is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Jelleberg
2006 ND 131 Highlight: Conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Interest of K.G. (Confidential)
2006 ND 130 Highlight: Order for continuing mental health treatment summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Rutherford
2006 ND 129 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted the defendant of burglary and assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
City of Fargo v. Curtis
2006 ND 128 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted the defendant of driving under the influence of alcohol and operating a motor vehicle without liability insurance is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Ballensky v. Flattum-Riemers, et al.
2006 ND 127
Highlight: A defendant's demand to file a complaint is personal to the demanding defendant, and a plaintiff's failure to file the complaint after a demand does not void the service of the summons as to other defendants. |
Interest of E.G., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL) (Consolidated w/20050448)
2006 ND 126
Highlight: To terminate parental rights, the petitioner must prove three elements by clear and convincing evidence: (1) the child is a deprived child, (2) the conditions and causes of the deprivation are likely to continue or will not be remedied, and (3) that by reason thereof the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. |
State v. Manning
2006 ND 125
Highlight: Relevant evidence is evidence having a tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. |
Tarnavsky v. Tarnavsky, et al.
2006 ND 124 Highlight: A case is remanded to the district court with directions to vacate an order confirming a sheriff's sale when the appellee concedes on appeal that errors occurred in the sheriff's sale and consents to vacation of the order confirming the sale. |
Porter v. Porter
2006 ND 123 Highlight: A district court must analyze all four Stout-Hawkinson factors in determining whether a custodial parent may move out of state with a child. |