Search Tips

Opinions

On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.

5831 - 5840 of 12359 results

Boser v. Hanson, et al. 2003 ND 95
Docket No.: 20020206
Filing Date: 6/17/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Jury instructions must fairly and adequately inform the jury of the applicable law.
A trial court may properly refuse to submit an inapplicable or irrelevant instruction to the jury.
Except as otherwise provided, N.D.C.C. 39-24-09 prohibits operating a snowmobile on a street or highway except while crossing a street or highway encountered as an obstacle to be overcome, rather than in its intended purpose of transportation along it.

Spath v. State (cross-ref. w/990302 & 970230) 2003 ND 94
Docket No.: 20030022
Filing Date: 6/17/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Marcotte's Builders Supply v. Strobel, et al. 2003 ND 93
Docket No.: 20020354
Filing Date: 6/17/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment in a home construction contract dispute is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Haugenoe, et al. v. Bambrick, et al. 2003 ND 92
Docket No.: 20020252
Filing Date: 6/6/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: If, in a medical malpractice case, the alleged malpractice is beyond the understanding of a layperson, an expert opinion must be obtained within three months of the commencement of the action to support the allegation of medical malpractice.
Issues not briefed by an appellant are deemed abandoned.
The requirement of obtaining an expert opinion within three months of the commencement of a medical malpractice action does not apply to informed consent claims.

Northern Plains Alliance, L.L.C. v. Mitzel, et al. 2003 ND 91
Docket No.: 20020324
Filing Date: 6/3/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: When parties enter an agreement for the sale of property which is expressly subject to a right of first refusal by a third party, the contract is conditional and becomes binding on the seller only if the right of first refusal is not exercised.
Acceptance of an option for the sale of land within the time allowed and according to its terms converts the option into a binding executory contract of sale.

Sonsthagen v. Sprynczynatyk 2003 ND 90
Docket No.: 20020297
Filing Date: 6/5/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: For a law enforcement officer to testify about the results of a sobriety test, the proper foundation to be established is evidence of the officer's training and experience in administering the test and evidence that the test was properly administered.
Probable cause to arrest for driving under the influence of drugs exists when an officer: 1) observes signs of a driver's physical or mental impairment; and 2) has reason to believe the impairment is caused by drugs.

State v. Corum 2003 ND 89
Docket No.: 20020230
Filing Date: 6/5/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: Illegally obtained evidence cannot be the basis for a magistrate's finding of probable cause to support a search warrant.
To challenge a search warrant on the basis that police intentionally omitted relevant information when applying for the warrant, the defendant must show that probable cause would not have existed if the omitted information had been provided to the magistrate.
Failure to inform a magistrate about an informant's criminal history and pending criminal charges is not fatal to the validity of a search warrant.

K.L.B., et al. v. S.B. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2003 ND 88
Docket No.: 20030034
Filing Date: 6/3/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Paternity
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The court can vacate a default judgment when circumstances justify it under a properly raised motion for relief from the judgment under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b).
Under N.D.C.C. 14-17-10 the district court is required to order genetic tests only if the request for tests is made when proceedings are pending to adjudicate parentage under the chapter.

Ramey v. Twin Butte School Dist. 2003 ND 87
Docket No.: 20020342
Filing Date: 6/3/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: To establish a prima facie case of discrimination for failure-to-hire under the North Dakota Human Rights Act, a plaintiff must show: (1) she is a member of a protected class under the Human Rights Act; (2) she sought and was qualified for the position; (3) she suffered an adverse employment decision; and (4) others not in the protected class were treated more favorably.

Trinity Health v. North Central Emergency Services 2003 ND 86
Docket No.: 20020317
Filing Date: 6/3/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Whether a contract has been substantially performed and whether a party has breached a contract are questions of fact.
When there has been a motion for summary judgment, but no cross-motion, the court already is engaged in determining if a genuine issue of material fact exists, the parties have been given an opportunity to present evidence to support or refute the request, and summary judgment may be rendered in favor of the party opposing the motion without a formal cross- motion.

Page 584 of 1236