Opinions

Koehler v. County of Grand Forks, et al. 2003 ND 44
Docket No.: 20020188
Filing Date: 3/26/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A plaintiff alleging a failure-to-promote discrimination claim under the North Dakota Human Rights Act must show: (1) she was a member of a protected group; (2) she was qualified and applied for a promotion to an available position; (3) she was rejected; and (4) a similarly qualified employee who was not part of a protected group was promoted instead.
An ongoing personality conflict does not transform into an actionable disability claim merely because one party becomes disabled.

American Ntl. Fire Ins. Co. v. Hughes 2003 ND 43
Docket No.: 20020207
Filing Date: 3/26/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: An insurer is precluded from obtaining subrogation from its insured.
For purposes of subrogation, a closely held corporation's officers and employees may be implied co-insureds under a policy insuring the corporation's property.

Gronfur v. Workers Comp., et al. 2003 ND 42
Docket No.: 20020250
Filing Date: 3/26/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: When reapplying to resume discontinued disability benefits, a claimant must prove an actual wage loss caused by a significant change in the compensable medical condition.
For an actual wage loss, a claimant must have been earning wages from employment when the change in medical condition occurred causing at least a partial loss of those wages.

City of Grand Forks v. Ramstad 2003 ND 41
Docket No.: 20020120
Filing Date: 3/26/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: To establish a Brady violation, the defendant must show the prosecution withheld evidence which was favorable to him.
A defendant alleging a Brady violation must show he could not have obtained the undisclosed evidence with reasonable diligence.
Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 16, the prosecution has a duty to provide documents in the possession of the State Toxicologist's office, even if the defendant could have otherwise obtained the documents himself.

Wilson v. State 2003 ND 40
Docket No.: 20020353
Filing Date: 3/26/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A judgment summarily denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) and (6).

Murchison v. State 2003 ND 38
Docket No.: 20020273
Filing Date: 3/5/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A court may deny a post-conviction application on the grounds of misuse of process when a defendant inexcusably fails to pursue an issue leading to judgment of conviction, inexcusably fails to pursue an issue on appeal having raised the issue in the trial court, or inexcusably fails to raise an issue in an initial post-conviction proceeding.
A court may deny a post-conviction application on the grounds of res judicata if the same claims have been fully and finally determined in a previous proceeding.

Hegland v. McKechnie 2003 ND 37
Docket No.: 20020199
Filing Date: 3/5/2003
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The details of prior private discipline should not be alleged in a petition for public discipline.
Expert testimony about whether or not a rule of professional conduct has been violated is inappropriate in disciplinary proceedings.

State v. Jahner 2003 ND 36
Docket No.: 20020143
Filing Date: 3/5/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Homicide
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Failure to raise an appropriate objection in the trial court waives the right, and the issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Waiver applies to all rights and privileges to which a person is legally entitled when they are for the benefit of and rest in the individual who waived them.
A trial court is neither required to nor prohibited from instructing the jury on proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Strict standards of logical consistency need not be applied to jury verdicts in criminal cases. The standard for reconciling a jury verdict is whether the verdict is legally inconsistent.

City of Jamestown v. Tahran 2003 ND 35
Docket No.: 20020238
Filing Date: 3/5/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Violation of City Ordinance
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A criminal ordinance prohibiting the storage of junk on any private property, except in an enclosed building or on the premises of a licensed junk dealer, in a city is not a zoning ordinance.

Berger v. Holt 2003 ND 34
Docket No.: 20020139
Filing Date: 3/5/2003
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A parent's legal obligation to support his or her child continues when the child is placed in foster care.