Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6381 - 6390 of 12446 results
|
Lohstreter v. Lohstreter (cross-ref. w/970130)
2001 ND 45
Highlight: When the circumstances are appropriate, rehabilitative spousal support may continue after the remarriage of the disadvantaged spouse. |
|
State v. Berger
2001 ND 44
Highlight: Absent actual prejudice, violation of the statutory right to consult with counsel before submitting to an Intoxilyzer test is properly challenged by a motion to suppress the results of the test, rather than a motion to dismiss the charge. |
|
Tibor v. Tibor (Cross-reference w/970372 & 990020)
2001 ND 43
Highlight: The presumptively correct child support guidelines are rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence establishing a noncustodial parent's reduced ability to provide support due to visitation travel expenses and a downward deviation from the guidelines is in the best interests of the children. Until the guidelines define a "reduced ability to pay," an affidavit from the noncustodial parent testifying as to net income and anticipated travel expenses is sufficient rebuttal evidence. A trial court may use its discretion to determine whether visitation travel expenses may be deducted directly from the child support payments or from the noncustodial parent's gross monthly income to calculate net income for the purpose of determining the appropriate child support obligation, as the guidelines do not provide a method for calculating the deviation. |
|
State v. Keeney
2001 ND 42 Highlight: Conviction for delivery of a controlled substance is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Kopp v. Kopp
2001 ND 41 Highlight: Rule 60(b)(vi), N.D.R.Civ.P., authorizes the trial court, in its discretion, to provide relief from a judgment when the movant demonstrates it would be manifestly unjust to enforce the judgment. |
|
Anderson v. Jacobson
2001 ND 40
Highlight: A jury special verdict will be set aside on appeal only if it is perverse and contrary to the evidence. |
|
Runge v. Runge
2001 ND 39 Highlight: Judgment valuing and distributing marital property is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Snyder v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau
2001 ND 38
Highlight: Unless otherwise provided, statutes in effect on the date of an injury govern workers compensation benefits. |
|
Interest of C.H., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2001 ND 37 Highlight: The juvenile court has exclusive original jurisdiction over proceedings concerning unruly children. The custodian has the right to determine the nature of the care, placement, and treatment of the child, except for any limits the court may impose. The underlying obligation of the juvenile court under the Uniform Juvenile Court Act is to protect the welfare of the children. |
|
Schroeder, et al. v. Buchholz, et al.
2001 ND 36
Highlight: The existence of a constructive trust must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. To establish a constructive trust, a party must prove the existence of both a confidential relationship and unjust enrichment. |