Opinions

Wetzel v. ND Dept. of Transportation 2001 ND 35
Docket No.: 20000186
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: Whether a person has been afforded a reasonable opportunity to contact an attorney is a mixed question of law and fact.
The reasonableness of the opportunity given an arrestee to contact an attorney is tested objectively, focusing on the totality of the circumstances.

Peek v. Berning 2001 ND 34
Docket No.: 20000056
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: An award of rotating physical custody is only appropriate after finding the parents can communicate and cooperate sufficiently to ensure the child's best interests would not be jeopardized by an alternating custody schedule.

K.L.G v. S.L.N. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2001 ND 33
Docket No.: 20000158
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Paternity
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Upon request of the noncustodial parent, a court shall grant visitation that will enable the child and the noncustodial parent to maintain a parent-child relationship beneficial to the child.
Visitation between a child and a noncustodial parent is not merely a privilege of the noncustodial parent, but a right of the child.
Visitation with the noncustodial parent is presumed to be in the child's best interests.
A visitation schedule which provides less frequent, but extended, visitation periods will preserve a noncustodial parent's ability to foster and develop a relationship with the child.

Aalund v. ND Workers Comp. 2001 ND 32
Docket No.: 20000208
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Workers Compensation
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The failure to give the N.D.C.C. 28-32-11 perjury admonition in a discovery deposition does not preclude the admission of the deposition at an administrative hearing.
In appeals from administrative agencies, courts generally may consider only those issues identified in the specifications of error.
Section 65-05-33, N.D.C.C., authorizes the forfeiture of any additional benefits if a claimant willfully makes a material false statement regarding a claim for benefits.

Northrop v. Northrop 2001 ND 31
Docket No.: 20000157
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A trial court must articulate a rationale for a substantial disparity in the distribution of the marital estate.

Moszer, et al. v. Witt (CONSOLIDATED w/20000203) 2001 ND 30
Docket No.: 20000202
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A jury verdict which assesses fault to a person after finding the person's negligence was not a proximate cause is a clearly inconsistent and perverse verdict.
Litigating parties have a right to have exceptions noted to the instructions to which they did not agree.
A party is entitled to a new jury trial when the court so injects itself into the jury deliberation process on the merits that the parties have been denied their right to have the jury determine the facts on the instructions given to them as approved by the parties.
When a party challenges the constitutionality of an act in an action where neither the state nor an agency or officer thereof is a party, the party raising the constitutional issue must notify the attorney general, who may then intervene on behalf of the State.

Vogel v. Braun, et al. 2001 ND 29
Docket No.: 20000193
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A prison inmate may access funds in his release aid account if authorized by the warden.
A trial court may deny a motion to proceed in forma pauperis if the action is totally without merit.
A party requesting oral argument under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a) cannot complain about a lack of notice of a time change brought about at his request.

Greenwood v. Paracelsus Health Care, et al. 2001 ND 28
Docket No.: 20000175
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: Section 28-01-46, N.D.C.C., which requires an affidavit of an expert to support an allegation of medical malpractice, does not apply once the trial has begun.
To establish a prima facie case of medical malpractice, the plaintiff must present evidence establishing the applicable standard of care, a violation of that standard, and a causal relationship between the violation and the alleged harm.
A medical malpractice plaintiff may establish the relevant standard of care and a prima facie case through cross-examination of the defendant physician.

Strutz v. State 2001 ND 27
Docket No.: 20000268
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A trial court's findings of fact in a post-conviction relief proceeding will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.

Carry Mocassin, et al. v. State Farm 2001 ND 26
Docket No.: 20000065
Filing Date: 2/15/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Summary judgment dismissing claims for deceit, negligent misrepresentation, bad faith, and infliction of emotional distress is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).