Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
111 - 120 of 12320 results
Disciplinary Board v. Daniel
2024 ND 191 Highlight: Lawyer disbarment ordered. |
Kath v. Farmers Union Mutual Ins. Co., et al.
2024 ND 190 Highlight: An endorsement is part of the insurance contract. The body of an insurance policy and the endorsements are read as a whole with every attempt to give effect to all of the provisions. When there is a conflict between an endorsement and other policy provisions, the endorsement prevails. |
Guardianship and Conservatorship of K.H.P.
2024 ND 189
Highlight: Unless a statute imposing a time limit declares the time limit is jurisdictional, we will not treat the time limit as affecting the jurisdiction of a court or administrative agency. |
Curtis v. Curtis, et al.
2024 ND 188 Highlight: An appeal from a district court judgment is dismissed because the appeal was untimely. The time to appeal the judgment was not tolled under N.D.R.App.P. 4(a)(3)(A)(vi) because a Rule 60, N.D.R.Civ.P., motion was not filed and served within 28 days from notice of entry of judgment. |
Samaniego v. State
2024 ND 187
Highlight: A prosecutor's question to a law enforcement officer whether, at any point during the officer's investigation, the officer interviewed the defendant did not violate the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. |
State v. Jalloh (consolidated w/20240009)
2024 ND 186 Highlight: Judgments entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of tampering with evidence and murder are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
State v. Jalloh (consolidated w/20240010)
2024 ND 186 Highlight: Judgments entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of tampering with evidence and murder are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
Martinez v. State
2024 ND 185 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief from the judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Woolsey v. State
2024 ND 184 Highlight: The Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 29-32.1, does not apply to juvenile adjudications. |
Liberty Petroleum Corp. v. NDIC, et al.
2024 ND 183
Highlight: Pre-unitization costs of drilling and operating a well, which is now attributed to the unit, reasonably fall within the definition of unit expense. Under unitization, the risk penalty may be recovered out of, and only out of, production from the unit. |