Opinions
81 - 90 of 12776 results
Divide County v. Stateline Service, et al.
2022 ND 24 Highlight: A road restriction is not published for purposes of N.D.C.C. § 39-12-03(2)(a) unless the information is available in the typical location where a user seeking such information would expect to find it. |
Bubel v. Bubel
2022 ND 23 Highlight: An order denying a motion to modify primary residential responsibility is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Friesz v. State
2022 ND 22
Highlight: An applicant has the burden to support their application for post-conviction relief with competent admissible evidence once the State moves for summary dismissal. |
State v. Martinez
2022 ND 21 Highlight: A criminal judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7) as the defendant failed to move to dismiss based on a speedy trial violation. |
Simmons v. Cudd Pressure Control, et al.
2022 ND 20
Highlight: Contractual waiver requires a right or privilege a party is legally entitled to enforce. |
Anderson v. Pedie, et al.
2022 ND 19
Highlight: A motion to modify primary residential responsibility made within two years of an order establishing primary residential responsibility triggers the heightened requirements of N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(1), (3), (5). The district court shall consider a motion to modify primary residential responsibility on briefs and without oral argument or evidentiary hearing and shall deny the motion unless the court finds the moving party has established a prima facie case justifying a modification. Allegations alone do not establish a prima facie case, and affidavits supporting the motion for modification must include competent information, which usually requires the affiant have first-hand knowledge. |
State v. Bolinske, Sr.
2022 ND 18
Highlight: A person arrested and detained without a warrant is entitled to a probable cause determination within 48 hours. |
Fischer v. Hoyt
2022 ND 17
Highlight: Recovery of attorney’s fees by a prevailing plaintiff under N.D.C.C. § 27-08.1-04 is available after the defendant removes a small claims action to the district court. |
Pomarleau v. Pomarleau, et al.
2022 ND 16
Highlight: A district court may consider whether an obligor made a voluntary change in employment, and if they find the obligor did, the district court has the discretion to base the obligor’s child support income based on the previous, higher income. |
Wald v. Hovey, et al.
2022 ND 15 Highlight: A demand for a change of judge under N.D.C.C. § 29-15-21 is precluded if the judge has ruled upon any matter pertaining to the action or proceeding in which the demanding party was heard or had an opportunity to be heard. |