Opinions

IRET Properties, et al. v. Williams County Board of Commissioners 2018 ND 223
Docket No.: 20180070
Filing Date: 10/3/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Administrative Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Motion to dismiss granted.

Interest of S.R. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2018 ND 222
Docket No.: 20180346
Filing Date: 10/3/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An appeal from a district court order granting Prairie St. John’s Hospital’s request to involuntarily treat S.R. with prescription medication is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4).

Estate of Moore 2018 ND 221
Docket No.: 20170332
Filing Date: 10/3/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A contract’s language governs its interpretation if the language is clear and explicit and does not involve an absurdity.
The general partnership laws, N.D.C.C. chapters 45-13 through 45-21, govern a partnership to the extent a partnership agreement does not otherwise provide.

Tamba v. State 2018 ND 220
Docket No.: 20180046
Filing Date: 10/3/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Order denying post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

Dockter v. Dockter, et al. 2018 ND 219
Docket No.: 20180131
Filing Date: 10/1/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Borsheim Builders Supply, Inc. v. Manger Insurance, Inc., et al. 2018 ND 218
Docket No.: 20180082
Filing Date: 9/25/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: Summary judgment is a procedural device for the prompt resolution of a controversy on the merits without a trial if there are no genuine issues of material fact or inferences that can reasonably be drawn from undisputed facts, or if the only issues to be resolved are questions of law.

The burden of proof rests on a party claiming coverage under an insurance policy, but the insurer has the burden of establishing the applicability of exclusions.

State v. Wangstad 2018 ND 217
Docket No.: 20170452
Filing Date: 9/25/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: It is not obvious error for a district court to admit into evidence statements concerning a defendant’s prior bad acts at the defendant’s request.

When a defendant does not object to jury instructions at trial, this Court’s review is limited to whether the jury instructions constitute plain error.

When considering a challenge to sufficiency of the evidence, this Court draws all reasonable inferences in favor of the verdict.

State v. Bohe 2018 ND 216
Docket No.: 20170456
Filing Date: 9/25/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: If a law enforcement officer fails to provide a driver the complete statutory implied consent advisory after the defendant’s arrest and before the driver’s submission to the chemical test, the result is inadmissible in any criminal or administrative proceeding.

The United States Supreme Court decision in Birchfield v. North Dakota did not abrogate the statutory advisory or admissibility standard.

State v. Seidel 2018 ND 215
Docket No.: 20180035
Filing Date: 9/25/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court may impose both a maximum probation sentence and a maximum imprisonment sentence for misdemeanors.

Constitutional issues will not be considered for the first time on appeal.

Riskey v. Riskey (consolidated w/20170393) 2018 ND 214
Docket No.: 20170392
Filing Date: 9/20/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A trust is void or subject to reformation by the court to the extent its creation was induced by fraud, duress, or undue influence.
The “law of the case” doctrine and the scope of the parties’ appeal define the parameters of review on appeal.
Claims of undue influence can be properly disposed of by summary judgment when the parties claiming undue influence have failed to support their opposition to the summary judgment motion with sufficient facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.