On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1951 - 1960 of 12235 results
Interest of E.P. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2018 ND 193
Docket No.: 20180271
Filing Date: 8/28/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Riemers v. Jaeger
2018 ND 192
Docket No.: 20180274
Filing Date: 8/3/2018
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Crothers, Daniel John
Highlight: A writ of mandamus may be issued to compel performance of an act which the law specifically enjoins as a duty resulting from an office. The plain language of N.D.C.C. 16.1-16-01(1)(a) requires an automatic recount when an individual fails to be nominated in a primary election by one percent or less of the highest vote cast for a candidate for the office sought and does not require the candidate with the highest vote to be in the same political party as the individual obtaining the recount.
Interest of M.S.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20180173 & 20180174)
2018 ND 191
Docket No.: 20180172
Filing Date: 8/1/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
Interest of A.T. (Confidential)
2018 ND 190
Docket No.: 20180269
Filing Date: 7/31/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: A juvenile court order terminating a mother's parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
N.D. Legislative Assembly, et al. v. Burgum
2018 ND 189
Docket No.: 20170436
Filing Date: 7/30/2018
Case Type: Original Proceeding - Civil - Writ of Mandamus
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.
Highlight: The Governor cannot withdraw a veto or otherwise concede it was ineffective. An "item" in an appropriation bill may be vetoed in its entirety, but it may not be reduced or scaled. If the "item" is an appropriation included in a larger subdivision or otherwise aggregated into a larger appropriation, the effect of an item veto is to subtract the item from the larger total. The Governor may strike words or numbers in a bill, but he may not insert them. The Legislative Assembly may not insulate an item from veto by including it within a larger appropriation, funding that larger appropriation from multiple special funds, or failing to identify the funding source for the item. In the context of a legislative appropriation, the Legislative Assembly must specify (1) the amount, (2) the object or purpose for which the amount is authorized, and (3) the fund from which the amount is set apart. The item veto power does not authorize the Governor to veto any part of a statement of legislative intent.
Disciplinary Board v. Turcotte
2018 ND 188
Docket No.: 20180262
Filing Date: 7/30/2018
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered.
Disciplinary Board v. Bruhn
2018 ND 187
Docket No.: 20180243
Filing Date: 7/30/2018
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered.
Disciplinary Board v. Bruhn
2018 ND 186
Docket No.: 20180242
Filing Date: 7/30/2018
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam
Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered.
State v. Biwer
2018 ND 185
Docket No.: 20170458
Filing Date: 7/26/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Crothers, Daniel John
Highlight: Conclusory or bare information is not sufficient for probable cause to obtain a search warrant. Information obtained from named members of the public with corroborating independent investigation by police may establish a nexus between the place to be searched and the contraband sought.,br> The North Dakota Constitution does not provide greater protection than the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Kovalevich v. State
2018 ND 184
Docket No.: 20180109
Filing Date: 7/18/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.
Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-01(3)(a)(1), a court may consider an application for post-conviction relief on the basis of newly discovered evidence outside of the general two-year statute of limitations if the petitioner meets the four-pronged test set forth in Greywind v. State, 2004 ND 213, 18, 689 N.W.2d 390.
