Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
1971 - 1980 of 12446 results
|
Bridgeford v. Sorel
2019 ND 153
Highlight: An officer’s actions remained within the community caretaker exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment when he knocked on the car window of an individual who appeared to be sleeping with the car running in a gas station parking lot. |
|
State v. Taylor
2019 ND 152 Highlight: Appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
City of Dickinson v. Vaagen
2019 ND 151
Highlight: A criminal judgment finding defendant guilty of driving under the influence is summarily reversed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(b). |
|
Schatz v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2019 ND 150 Highlight: District court’s judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation decision suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
Everett v. State
2019 ND 149
Highlight: In post-conviction relief proceedings, it is not an abuse of discretion to deny default judgment when a petitioner cannot show he suffered any prejudice from the State's untimely response. |
|
Blackcloud v. State
2019 ND 148
Highlight: A district court order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Frontier Fiscal Services LLC v. Pinky's Aggregates, Inc., et al.
2019 ND 147
Highlight: The burden of proof ordinarily rests with the party who possesses the facts on the issue in dispute. |
|
Atkins v. State
2019 ND 146
Highlight: An applicant for post-conviction relief should have 14 days to respond to a motion to dismiss under N.D.R.Ct. 3.2(a)(2). |
|
State v. Atkins
2019 ND 145
Highlight: A defendant may not avoid the procedures of the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act by designating his motion under a rule of criminal procedure or by filing his motion in his criminal file, rather than filing as a new action for post-conviction relief. |
|
Swenson, et al. v. Mahlum, et al.
2019 ND 144
Highlight: Order and judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claims with prejudice and defendant’s third-party claims without prejudice was appealable because plaintiff’s claims were adjudicated and third-party claims were dependent on plaintiff’s claims. |