Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
2161 - 2170 of 12235 results
|
State v. Vann
2017 ND 275 Highlight: Criminal convictions for terrorizing are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
State v. Anderson
2017 ND 274 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after the defendant pled guilty to gross sexual imposition, aggravated assault - domestic violence, and felonious restraint is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
|
State v. Palacio (consolidated w/20170181)
2017 ND 273 Highlight: An appellant who fails to provide a trial transcript on appeal makes it impossible for the Court to conduct a meaningful and intelligent review of a claim of insufficiency of the evidence. |
|
Matter of Reciprocal Discipline of Huisman
2017 ND 272 Highlight: Lawyer Suspension ordered. |
|
Rogers v. State
2017 ND 271
Highlight: Whether a defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of fact and law fully reviewable on appeal. |
|
Altru Specialty Services, Inc. v. N.D. Dep't of Human Services, et al.
2017 ND 270 Highlight: The district court does not acquire subject matter jurisdiction over an appeal from an administrative agency decision unless the appellant satisfies statutory requirements for perfecting an appeal. |
|
Sundance Oil and Gas, LLC v. Hess Corporation
2017 ND 269 Highlight: A district court may not use the findings in an unlocatable mineral owner trust action as res judicata in a subsequent quiet title action to resolve all factual disputes regarding whether a later purchaser was a good-faith purchaser for value. |
|
State v. Montgomery
2017 ND 268 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of violating a disorderly conduct restraining order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
Motter, et al. v. Traill Rural Water District
2017 ND 267
Highlight: Raising the decisive issue for a judgment in post-trial briefing can constitute "surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against" sufficient to grant a new trial. |
|
Forsman v. Blues Brews and Bar-B-Ques Inc., et al. (cross-ref. w/20110356)
2017 ND 266
Highlight: Under a Miller-Shugart agreement and judgment, an insured defendant may stipulate for settlement of a plaintiff's claims and stipulate judgment may be collected only from the proceeds of any insurance policy, with no personal liability to the defendant. The stipulated judgment is not conclusive on the insurer. |