Opinions

Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Erwin 2018 ND 119
Docket No.: 20170275
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: When a party moves to amend a pleading in response to a motion for summary judgment, the proposed amendment must be theoretically viable and supported by substantial evidence.
A party requesting a continuance for additional time for discovery under N.D.R.Civ.P. 56(f) must identify with specificity what information is sought and explain how that information would preclude summary judgment and why the information was not previously obtained.

Estate of Nelson 2018 ND 118
Docket No.: 20170246
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: A life tenant may convey or lease his or her interest, but may not disregard the rights of those who take when the life estate ends.
An appeal is frivolous when it is flagrantly groundless.

Matter of Hogen Trust B 2018 ND 117
Docket No.: 20170090
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: In the absence of trust language specifying a termination date for a trust, termination occurs when the object or purpose of the trust is accomplished.

A trustee has a fiduciary duty to a trust and may be liable to the trust for breaches of that duty.

An award of trustee fees and attorney fees is reviewed under the abuse-of-discretion standard.

IRET Properties v. Lee, et al. 2018 ND 116
Docket No.: 20170451
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The purpose of the summary eviction statute is to provide an inexpensive, expeditious, and simple means to determine possession of property. The right to the possession of disputed real estate is the only fact that can be rightfully litigated in a summary eviction action unless damages or rent is claimed.
Appellant's failure to file a transcript leaves this Court to only look to the record in reviewing the district court's findings.

Hoff v. Hoff 2018 ND 115
Docket No.: 20180022
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A district court need not make separate findings for each best interests factor but, as with custody, the court's findings must contain sufficient specificity to show the factual basis for the decision.
The purpose of an appeal is to review the actions of the trial court, not to grant the appellant an opportunity to develop and expound upon new strategies or theories.

Everett v. State 2018 ND 114
Docket No.: 20170431
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Orders denying leave to file additional motions or papers are not appealable.

N.D. Dep't of Transportation v. Schmitz 2018 ND 113
Docket No.: 20170397
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A trial court may award reasonable attorney fees, expert witness fees, or litigation costs to the prevailing party in an eminent domain action.
A trial court abuses its discretion if it misinterprets or misapplies the law.

State v. $3260.00 United States Currency, et al. 2018 ND 112
Docket No.: 20180045
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: The application of N.D.R.Civ.P. 56, summary judgment, may be appropriate in a forfeiture action.
A district court may decide a motion for summary judgment without holding a hearing if the requesting party fails to secure a time for the hearing.
A district court does not err in granting summary judgment when the opposing party fails to present competent admissible evidence.

Botteicher, et al. v. Becker, et al. 2018 ND 111
Docket No.: 20170386
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: Res judicata prevents the litigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in a prior action between the same parties or their privies and were resolved by a final judgment in a court of competent jurisdiction.
The failure to file an appeal from a final decree of distribution within the time specified bars a party to the proceedings from attacking the final decree of distribution if he received notice of the distribution hearing.
Whether the threshold of extreme and outrageous conduct has been met to establish intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law for the court to decide.

Kettle Butte Trucking, LLC v. Kelly, et al. 2018 ND 110
Docket No.: 20170350
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Jensen, Jon J.

Highlight: When a contempt order is appealed, challenges to the underlying order will not be considered unless the underlying order is also appealed.
When a court has issued an allegedly erroneous order, the party to whom the order was issued must obey it as long as it remains in force or until it is reversed on appeal, and the failure to obey the order is punishable as a contempt of court.