Search Tips

Opinions

On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.

2201 - 2210 of 12359 results

Wheeler v. Burgum 2018 ND 109
Docket No.: 20170444
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Because the Governor does not directly supervise or train the officials and staff of the North Dakota State Penitentiary, he cannot be held liable in his official capacity under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for a failure of such action.

Krueger v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation 2018 ND 108
Docket No.: 20170425
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: A county deputy in fresh pursuit may enter another county to make an arrest if obtaining the aid of officers having jurisdiction would cause a delay permitting escape.
North Dakota law does not prohibit law enforcement from administering more than one chemical test to determine blood alcohol content.

Interest of F.M.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2018 ND 107
Docket No.: 20180139
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court's order for continuing treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed one year is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Interest of R.C. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2018 ND 106
Docket No.: 20180090
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Interest of A.H. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2018 ND 105
Docket No.: 20180107
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An appeal from a juvenile court order terminating parental rights is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Parks 2018 ND 104
Docket No.: 20170462
Filing Date: 5/8/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An amended criminal judgment for possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

Disciplinary Board v. Popper 2018 ND 102
Docket No.: 20180113
Filing Date: 5/3/2018
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded.

CHS Inc. v. Riemers 2018 ND 101
Docket No.: 20170331
Filing Date: 4/17/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Attorney's fees and costs may be awarded under N.D.C.C. 28-26-01(2) whether or not they are also available under N.D.R.Civ.P. 11.
Attorney's fees and costs may be assessed under N.D.C.C. 28-26-01(2) for a frivolous motion.
Post-judgment interest can accrue on a judgment that includes prejudgment costs and interest.
Unless an exception applies, a judgment or order entered in the district court, after the Supreme Court obtains jurisdiction, is void for lack of jurisdiction.

State v. Cook 2018 ND 100
Docket No.: 20170269
Filing Date: 4/12/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair

Highlight: To satisfy the requirement of authenticating or identifying an item of evidence, the proponent must produce evidence sufficient to support a finding that the item is what the proponent claims it is. N.D.R.Ev. 901(a).
Statutes are not retroactive unless expressly declared so by the legislature, noting an exception for ameliorating penal legislation. A statute cannot apply retroactively when it becomes effective after a person has been finally convicted otherwise it would constitute an invalid exercise by the legislature of the executive pardoning power.
A district court is allowed a wide range of discretion in fixing a criminal sentence. Appellate review of a criminal sentence is generally limited to whether the district court acted within sentencing limits prescribed by statute, or substantially relied upon an impermissible factor.

Nelson, et al. v. Mattson, et al. (consolidated w/20170287) 2018 ND 99
Docket No.: 20170286
Filing Date: 4/10/2018
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Foreclosure
Author: Tufte, Jerod E.

Highlight: Joint ventures can own property similarly to partnerships.
In determining whether property is owned by a partnership or is individually-owned by a partner, the district court must rely on the intention of the partners.
A voluntary payment made under a mutual mistake of law precludes recovery of that payment.

Page 221 of 1236