Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3231 - 3240 of 12279 results
|
Osier v. State
2014 ND 41 Highlight: To meet the prejudice prong of the Strickland ineffective assistance of counsel test, the defendant bears the heavy burden of establishing a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. |
|
Peterson, et al. v. Jasmanka, et al.
2014 ND 40
Highlight: The statutory procedure in N.D.C.C. ch. 38-18.1 allowing a surface owner to acquire abandoned minerals is a separate, distinct procedure from a subsequent quiet title action. |
|
Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bahr-Renner, et al.
2014 ND 39
Highlight: The phrase "resident of your household" in an automobile insurance policy is not ambiguous, and the determination of whether a person falls within the meaning of the phrase is a question of fact. |
|
Zavadil, et al. v. Rud, et al.
2014 ND 38 Highlight: An accommodation party is obliged to pay an instrument in the capacity in which the accommodation party signs. |
|
Balvitsch, et al. v. Dakota Burger N Fries Corp., et al.
2014 ND 37
Highlight: Due process requires a contemnor receive notice and a fair hearing when the alleged contempt involves conduct outside the court's presence. |
|
Tweed v. State
2014 ND 36 Highlight: Appeal from denial of application for post-conviction relief summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Shaft
2014 ND 35 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
|
Anderson, et al. v. Zimbelman, et al.
2014 ND 34
Highlight: Constructive fraud requires a breach of duty leading to an advantage for the party misleading. The breach of duty generally arises from a confidential or fiduciary relationship between the parties. |
|
Judicial Conduct Commission v. Hagar
2014 ND 33 Highlight: A judge may be suspended without pay for a violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct. |
|
Interest of G.R. (Confidential)
2014 ND 32
Highlight: In termination of parental rights cases, the petitioner must prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that the child is deprived, the conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue or will not be remedied, and the child is suffering or will probably suffer serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm. |