Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3231 - 3240 of 12446 results
Abelmann, et al. v. SmartLease USA, L.L.C.
2014 ND 227 Highlight: A district court's factual findings must be adequate to understand the basis for the court's decision. |
Podrygula, et al. v. Bray, et al.
2014 ND 226
Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is appealable if it has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum. |
Schmitt, et al. v. Schmitt, et al.
2014 ND 225 Highlight: Without a transcript, the record is considered when reviewing whether a district court's findings are clearly erroneous. |
State v. Nagel
2014 ND 224 Highlight: There is no logical difference between a pre-arrest onsite screening test and a post-arrest chemical test in terms of determining voluntariness of consent under the implied consent statute. |
Guardianship of P.T. (CONFIDENTIAL)(consolidated w/20140167-20140170)
2014 ND 223
Highlight: Although it is preferable for trial courts to prepare their own findings of fact, a trial court will not be reversed for adopting proposed findings prepared by counsel. |
George v. George
2014 ND 222 Highlight: A district court has permissive or non-mandatory authority to grant a restraining order if it finds reasonable grounds to believe a respondent has engaged in disorderly conduct. |
Albrecht v. Albrecht
2014 ND 221 Highlight: A party's death before entry of a final divorce judgment abates a divorce action. |
Coss v. Levi
2014 ND 220 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer's decision suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |
Interest of D.C.
2014 ND 219 Highlight: An involuntary treatment with medication order is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Greybear v. State
2014 ND 218 Highlight: District court judgment denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |