Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3261 - 3270 of 12446 results
MKB Management Corp, et al. v. Burdick, et al.
2014 ND 197
Highlight: The concurrence of four of the five justices of the North Dakota Supreme Court is necessary to declare a statute unconstitutional. |
Interest of J.A.H. (Consolidated w/20140146)
2014 ND 196 Highlight: When a juvenile court provides insufficient findings to review, jurisdiction may be retained under N.D.R.App.P. 35(a)(3) and the case remanded with instructions that the juvenile court make expedited findings of fact. |
State v. Fetch
2014 ND 195
Highlight: A driver who has refused a chemical test but later changes his mind and consents to the test can cure the prior refusal. |
Interest of G.L.D. (CONFIDENTIAL) (cross-reference w/20100230 & 20120175)
2014 ND 194
Highlight: In proceedings for commitment of a sexually dangerous individual, the committed individual has a right to obtain individually identifiable health information and any confidential records provided to the state's attorney. |
State v. Patterson
2014 ND 193
Highlight: While a prosecutor's improper suggestions, insinuations, and, especially, assertions of personal knowledge are apt to carry much weight against the accused when they should properly carry none, inappropriate prosecutorial comments, standing alone, would not justify a reviewing court to reverse a criminal conviction obtained in an otherwise fair proceeding. |
Desert Partners IV, L.P., et al. v. Benson, et al.
2014 ND 192
Highlight: The N.D. Rules of Court are ambiguous as to whether facsimile transmission is an acceptable method of filing for self-represented litigants. |
State v. Everett (Cross-ref.w/20070074, 20080063, 20090244, 20100222, 20100392)
2014 ND 191 Highlight: An order denying a petition alleging abuse of process and violation of due process in a criminal conviction for gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (6) and (7). |
State v. Tosseth
2014 ND 190 Highlight: A district court denial of a motion to suppress evidence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), (4) and (7). |
State v. Tveito
2014 ND 189 Highlight: A district court denial of a motion to suppress the results of a blood-alcohol test is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). |
Tveito v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation
2014 ND 188 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming a Department of Transportation hearing officer's order suspending driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5), (7). |