Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3211 - 3220 of 12279 results
|
Anderson v. Lyons, et al.
2014 ND 61
Highlight: Service of notice of entry of judgment is not required to begin the time for filing a post-judgment motion or appeal if the record clearly evidences actual knowledge of entry of judgment through affirmative action of the moving or appealing party. |
|
Risovi v. Job Service
2014 ND 60 Highlight: A fact finder's conclusions that false statements were made for the purpose of obtaining unemployment benefits are affirmed if a reasoning mind could have determined that the factual conclusions were proved by the weight of the evidence. |
|
State v. Johnson (cross ref. w/20130137 - briefs not published)
2014 ND 59 Highlight: Criminal judgment entered after a defendant conditionally pled guilty to possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
|
State v. Silva
2014 ND 58 Highlight: Convictions of gross sexual imposition and continuous sexual abuse of a child are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
|
Holkesvig v. Grove (cross reference w/ 20120169 & 20120225)
2014 ND 57
Highlight: Res judicata and collateral estoppel bar courts from relitigating claims and issues. |
|
Regan v. Lervold
2014 ND 56
Highlight: The party moving for modification of primary residential responsibility has the burden of proving a material change in circumstances has occurred. |
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 8, SCJD
2014 ND 55 Highlight: Supreme Court takes judicial notice of prior proceeding and orders judgeship retained and filled according to law. |
|
Vacancy in Judgeship No. 4, NCJD
2014 ND 54 Highlight: Judgeship retained in Minot. |
|
Hector v. City of Fargo
2014 ND 53
Highlight: An appeal from a decision imposing special assessments provides an adequate legal remedy for challenging special assessments, and a separate action for equitable relief generally will not lie for issues that are raised or could have been raised in the appeal. |
|
Union Bank v. Tarnavsky, et al. (consol. w/20130387; cross-ref. w/ 20110061)
2014 ND 52 Highlight: Orders denying motions for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(d)(1) and a judgment dismissing a cross-claim in a foreclosure case are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). |