Opinions

State v. Leppert 2014 ND 207
Docket No.: 20140087
Filing Date: 11/12/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A noncriminal traffic case may not be appealed to the Supreme Court.

State v. Reddig 2014 ND 206
Docket No.: 20140123
Filing Date: 11/5/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: District court judgment denying motion to withdraw guilty plea is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

Matter of Aune 2014 ND 205
Docket No.: 20140042
Filing Date: 11/12/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Civil Commitment of Sexually Dangerous Individual
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order civilly committing an individual as a sexually dangerous offender is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

Ayala v. State 2014 ND 204
Docket No.: 20140140
Filing Date: 11/12/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order denying application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).

State v. Jones 2014 ND 203
Docket No.: 20140100
Filing Date: 11/12/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Criminal judgment for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver within 1,000 feet of a school and possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

State v. Murphy 2014 ND 202
Docket No.: 20140079
Filing Date: 11/5/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court is allowed a wide range of discretion in fixing a criminal sentence. Appellate review of a criminal sentence is generally confined to whether the district court acted within the sentencing limits set by statute, or substantially relied upon an impermissible factor.
A district court's interpretation of a statute in sentencing a defendant may be reviewed under limited circumstances.

Capps, et al. v. Weflen, et al. (cross-ref. w/20120184) 2014 ND 201
Docket No.: 20140110
Filing Date: 10/31/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Under the abandoned mineral statutes, a surface owner is required to conduct a reasonable inquiry only if the mineral owner's address does not appear of record, even if the surface owner knows the mineral owner whose address appears of record is deceased.
The notice provisions of the abandoned mineral statutes are constitutional under the due process clause.

Northstar Founders, LLC v. Hayden Capital USA, LLC, et al. 2014 ND 200
Docket No.: 20130245
Filing Date: 10/31/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The district court has personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant if the nonresident defendant committed a tort within or outside the state causing injury to another person or property within the state and the exercise of personal jurisdiction comports with due process.
The exercise of personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant comports with due process if the defendant purposely directed his activities at residents of the state and the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or related to those activities.
Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law, but if the contract is ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be considered to determine the parties' intent and the interpretation becomes a question of fact.
A third party may benefit from a contractual arrangement between others, but a party fails to establish an unjust enrichment claim against the third party if the alleged impoverishment results from a valid contractual arrangement.
A decision is final for purposes of collateral estoppel if it is not tentative, provisional, or contingent and represents the completion of all steps in the adjudication of the claim by the court.

Wilson v. Wilson 2014 ND 199
Docket No.: 20140037
Filing Date: 10/28/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The district court may order past child support covering a period when the parties are separated but divorce proceedings are not pending.
The district court may, but is not required to, apply the child support guidelines to determine the reasonable amount of past child support to order a party pay as reimbursement for a period when there is not a court order for support and a proceeding is not pending.
A child support obligor's military subsistence payments, including amounts for overseas cost of living and housing allowances, are gross income for child support purposes.

State v. Schneider 2014 ND 198
Docket No.: 20140153
Filing Date: 10/28/2014
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: A law enforcement officer's following with flashing lights a moving vehicle constitutes a pursuit, which constitutes a seizure under the Fourth Amendment. No seizure occurs if the defendant does not move his vehicle and the officer does not pursue him with flashing lights.