Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3311 - 3320 of 12446 results
Higginbotham v. WSI, et al.
2014 ND 147
Highlight: Whether a potential commute or relocation is unreasonably expensive cannot be determined when the employee has not yet searched for or been offered employment. |
Finstad, et al. v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc., et al.
2014 ND 146
Highlight: North Dakota law does not recognize the economic duress doctrine. |
Nieuwenhuis v. Nieuwenhuis
2014 ND 145
Highlight: Duress occurs when an individual acts as a result of coercion or when the individual's actions are involuntary. |
Middleton v. State
2014 ND 144
Highlight: To demonstrate prejudice in an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the defendant must establish a reasonable probability that but for counsel's errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different, and the defendant must specify how and where trial counsel was incompetent and the probable different result. |
Estates of Vizenor and Vizenor v. Mesling, et al.
2014 ND 143
Highlight: A power of attorney is a written instrument that authorizes one person to act as another person's agent. An agency created under a durable power of attorney also entails a confidential relationship and fiduciary duties. |
Vetter v. State (cross-reference w/20120015)
2014 ND 142 Highlight: An order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Comes v. State
2014 ND 141 Highlight: Summary disposition of application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
State v. Towry
2014 ND 140 Highlight: Criminal judgment for aggravated assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Reciprocal Discipline of Wynne
2014 ND 139 Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded. |
Hering v. WSI, et al.
2014 ND 138 Highlight: A district court judgment affirming an administrative law judge's order, which affirmed WSI's order denying benefits to a claimant, is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |