Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3351 - 3360 of 12279 results
|
Holte v. Holte
2013 ND 174
Highlight: When a substantial marital debt has been excluded from the marital estate, it is not possible to determine whether the district court would have reached the same result in allocating the assets and debts had it included the debt. |
|
Seibold v. Leverington (cross-reference w/ 20110152)
2013 ND 173
Highlight: Although a separate finding is not required for each statutory best interest factor, the court's findings must contain sufficient specificity to show the factual basis for the residential responsibility decision. |
|
Baatz v. State
2013 ND 172 Highlight: Questions raised and decided on a former appeal in the same action are not open for consideration on a subsequent appeal, because the decision on the first appeal, whether right or wrong, is the law of the case. |
|
Interest of Graham
2013 ND 171 Highlight: Res judicata does not apply to the second element of the sexually dangerous individual analysis, determining whether a committed individual has a congenital or acquired condition manifested by a sexual disorder, personality disorder or other mental disorder or dysfunction, when evaluating a committed sexually dangerous individual's petition for discharge. |
|
Stark County v. A motor vehicle, et al.
2013 ND 170 Highlight: Movement of a vehicle for weighing at the direction of a police officer is not movement for purposes of a weight-restriction violation. |
|
McColl Farms v. Pflaum
2013 ND 169
Highlight: A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it is disclosed with certainty the impossibility of proving a claim upon which relief can be granted. |
|
Hallin, et al. v. Lyngstad, et al.
2013 ND 168
Highlight: The language of the deed, if clear and explicit, governs its interpretation, and the parties' mutual intentions must be ascertained from the four corners of the deed, if possible. |
|
Anderson v. Jenkins
2013 ND 167
Highlight: A district court may conclude the moving party failed to establish a prima facie case for change of primary residential responsibility only if: (1) the opposing party's counter-affidavits conclusively establish that the moving party's allegations have no credibility; or (2) the moving party's allegations are insufficient on their face, even if uncontradicted, to justify modification. |
|
State v. Zander
2013 ND 166 Highlight: Possession of a controlled substance conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3). |
|
State v. Moran
2013 ND 165 Highlight: Criminal judgment for possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of marijuana paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |