Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3561 - 3570 of 12359 results
Larson, et al. v. Norheim, et al.
2013 ND 60
Highlight: The owners of a mineral interest may preserve their interest by recording a statement of claim within sixty days of the publication of a notice of lapse of mineral interest. |
Kruckenberg v. State (cross-reference w/20080106 & 20110333)
2013 ND 59 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
Woodward v. Woodward
2013 ND 58
Highlight: When deciding whether spousal support is appropriate, even if a spouse can be rehabilitated, a court may award permanent spousal support to ensure one party does not bear the brunt of the overall reduction in standard of living. |
K & L Homes, Inc. v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co.
2013 ND 57
Highlight: In an insurance policy, an exception to an exclusion may result in coverage, but is applicable only if the policy initially grants coverage and an exclusion precluding coverage applies. |
Waslaski v. State
2013 ND 56 Highlight: Arguments raised for the first time on appeal generally will not be considered by this Court. |
State v. Farrell
2013 ND 55 Highlight: The Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act provides no relief by dismissing criminal judgments entered before the request for disposition of charges, nor does it make available monetary relief. |
State v. Doppler
2013 ND 54
Highlight: A trial court abuses its discretion if the record does not show the court meaningfully or appropriately considered the relevant factors under N.D.R.Ev. 609(a)(1) when weighing a prior conviction's probative value and prejudicial effect. |
Nienow v. Anderson
2013 ND 53 Highlight: The N.D. Department of Human Service's determination of whether income is recurring is a finding of fact which will not be overturned on appeal unless it is not supported by a preponderance of the evidence. |
Niles, et al. v. Eldridge
2013 ND 52
Highlight: Issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered. |
HIT, Inc. v. N.D. Dep't of Human Services
2013 ND 51 Highlight: The N.D. Department of Human Services may set the margin requiring a refund of Individualized Supported Living Arrangements overpayments and does not require the margin be calculated in a particular way. |