Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3551 - 3560 of 12446 results
Brash v. Gulleson
2013 ND 156
Highlight: Failure of consideration is an affirmative defense that arises when a valid contract has been formed, but the performance bargained for has not been rendered. |
State v. Nickel (consolidated w/20120418)
2013 ND 155
Highlight: The protection against unreasonable searches and seizures proscribes only government action. |
Bloomquist v. The Goose River Bank, et al.
2013 ND 154
Highlight: An oral agreement to loan money providing for repayment extending for a period longer than one year, and which does not include express terms governing prepayment, is barred by the statute of frauds. |
Pifer v. McDermott (cross-reference 20110287)
2013 ND 153
Highlight: A person may gift an option to purchase real property. |
Solid Comfort, Inc. v. Hatchett Hospitality, Inc., et al.
2013 ND 152
Highlight: If personal jurisdiction us challenged, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving jurisdiction exists. The plaintiff must make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction to defeat a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. If the court relies only on pleadings and affidavits, the court must look at the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. |
Disciplinary Board v. Lee
2013 ND 151 Highlight: The purpose of the prohibition against a lawyer charging an unreasonable fee is to protect clients and the public from excessive fees which exceed the bounds of reasonableness in light of the amount and quality of the work performed, the results obtained, and the fees customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services. |
Estate of Cashmore (cross reference with 20090315)
2013 ND 150
Highlight: A remedial sanction for contempt, requires the alleged contemnor receive notice and a hearing. |
Johnson, et al. v. Finkle, et al.
2013 ND 149
Highlight: Under the Duhig rationale, a grantor cannot grant and reserve the same mineral interest, and if a grantor does not own a large enough mineral interest to satisfy both the grant and the reservation, the grant must be satisfied first. |
Datz v. Dosch (cross-reference w/ 20120167)
2013 ND 148
Highlight: The district court's findings under the statutory best interest of the child factors must contain sufficient specificity to show the factual basis for the court's decision. |
Bell, et al. v. Pro Tune Plus, et al.
2013 ND 147
Highlight: A district court does not have the authority to remand an action properly removed from the small claims court. |