Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3521 - 3530 of 12359 results
State v. Eagleman (Cross-reference w/20030149 & 20040359)
2013 ND 101
Highlight: A sentence will be vacated only if the court acted outside the limits prescribed by statute or substantially relied on an impermissible factor in determining the severity of the sentence. |
Frey v. Frey
2013 ND 100
Highlight: A custodial parent's move out of state and a non-custodial parent's temporary custody of a child are a material change in circumstances. |
Wotzka v. Minndakota Limited Partnership
2013 ND 99
Highlight: A condition that creates an open and obvious danger may limit the landowner's duty to its lawful entrants, but if the harm is expected from the standpoint of the landowner, the landowner is not relieved from his duty to keep the premises reasonably safe under the circumstances. |
Lario Oil & Gas Company, et al. v. EOG Resources, Inc.
2013 ND 98 Highlight: The specific description in a mineral lease is controlling when a discrepancy exists between the specific description of the property conveyed and an expression of the quantity conveyed. |
Albright v. WSI, et al.
2013 ND 97
Highlight: When presented with conflicting expert medical opinions, it is for WSI, not the district court, to weigh credibility and resolve conflicts. |
City of Fargo v. Moran
2013 ND 96 Highlight: Conviction for shoplifting is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Painte v. Dep't of Transportation
2013 ND 95 Highlight: Actual physical control of a vehicle does not require a defendant be able to drive a An affidavit attesting to the affiant's status as a designee of the director of the North Dakota Crime Laboratory is sufficient foundation for establishing prima facie evidence of the affiant's status as a designee for the purposes of section 29-20-07, N.D.C.C. |
State v. Butcher
2013 ND 93 Highlight: Criminal judgment for conspiracy to commit robbery is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
Spotted Wolf v. State
2013 ND 92 Highlight: Order denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). |
State v. Smith
2013 ND 91 Highlight: Criminal judgment for attempted robbery is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |