Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3711 - 3720 of 12359 results
Bakke v. D&A Landscaping Co., et al.
2012 ND 170
Highlight: A precursor to piercing a limited liability company owner's liability shield is that the company be liable to the claimant in the first instance. |
Burke v. State
2012 ND 169
Highlight: A person convicted of a crime may move for forensic DNA testing to demonstrate the person's actual innocence if the testing is to be performed on evidence secured in relation to the trial that resulted in the conviction and the evidence was not subje the testing because either the technology for the testing was not available at the time of the trial or the testing was not available as evidence at the time of the trial. |
Matter of S.E. (Confidential)
2012 ND 168
Highlight: A trial court may not enter an order or judgment that affects the merits of issues properly on appeal. |
Rudnick v. Rode
2012 ND 167
Highlight: The district court must comply with the procedural requirements in N.D.R.Ct. 8.2 when it issues an ex parte interim order, and it must find there are exceptional circumstances justifying the order based on evidence presented by affidavit. |
Smestad v. Harris (cross-ref. with 20100216)
2012 ND 166
Highlight: Absent specific instructions from this Court, a district court deciding an issue on remand must exercise its discretion when determining the procedure to follow. |
Falkenstein, et al. v. Dill, et al.
2012 ND 165
Highlight: The substance of a complaint is considered to determine whether the complaint sufficiently raised a claim. |
Mickelson v. Workforce Safety and Insurance
2012 ND 164
Highlight: Injuries attributable to a preexisting injury, disease, or other condition are compensable under workers' compensation law when employment substantially accelerates the progression or substantially worsens the severity of the injury, disease, or other condition. |
Schulte v. Kramer (cross-ref. 20050222)
2012 ND 163
Highlight: To justify a modification of spousal support, the moving party must demonstrate a material change in financial circumstances. A material change is one that substantially affects the financial abilities or needs of the parties and was not contemplated by the parties at the time the original divorce decree was entered. |
Kruckenberg v. State
2012 ND 162
Highlight: Under N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a) of the North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, in an action without a jury, the court must find the facts specially and state its conclusions of law separately. |
Disciplinary Board v. Lawler
2012 ND 161 Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered. |