Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
3711 - 3720 of 12446 results
Interest of J.N. (Confidential) (consolidated with 20120390)
2012 ND 256
Highlight: A specific finding that the child is currently deprived is a necessary prerequisite to termination of parental rights under N.D.C.C. 27-20-44(1)(c). |
Lund v. Lund, et al.
2012 ND 255
Highlight: The phrase "transacting any business in this state" in the long-arm jurisdiction provision under N.D.R.Civ.P. 4(b)(2)(A) must be given a broad, expansive interpretation. |
Interest of T.H. (CONFIDENTIAL)(cross reference with 20110084)
2012 ND 254
Highlight: Unless a statute imposing a time limit declares that the time limit is jurisdictional, the time limit will not be treated as affecting the jurisdiction of a court or administrative agency. |
D.E. v. K.F., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2012 ND 253
Highlight: A presumption of paternity arises when a man is married to the mother of a child and the child is born during the marriage. |
State v. Benefiel (Consolidated w/20120275)
2012 ND 252 Highlight: Two district court orders revoking a defendant's probation and resentencing him to five years' imprisonment are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
State v. Wolfgram
2012 ND 251 Highlight: Criminal judgment sentencing defendant to imprisonment within statutory range summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |
Interest of Voisine (Cross-reference w/20090182 & 20100163)
2012 ND 250 Highlight: Order denying request for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Disciplinary Board v. McCray
2012 ND 249 Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered. |
Deyle v. Deyle
2012 ND 248
Highlight: District courts must look both forward and backward when making primary residential responsibility findings under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2(1)(d) after factor (d) was amended in 2009. |
State v. Herzig
2012 ND 247 Highlight: When a legitimate dispute exists as to whether a road is a public road by prescription, resolution should take place civilly and not in a criminal trespass action. |