Opinions

Disciplinary Board v. Sletten 2007 ND 105
Docket No.: 20070184
Filing Date: 6/27/2007
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered.

Scheer v. Altru Health System, et al. 2007 ND 104
Docket No.: 20060333
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A dismissal without prejudice is ordinarily not appealable; however, a dismissal without prejudice may be final and appealable if the plaintiff cannot cure the defect that led to dismissal, or if the dismissal has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the plaintiff's chosen forum.
North Dakota's medical malpractice law requires a plaintiff to serve the defendant with an admissible expert affidavit that supports a prima facie case of malpractice within three months of serving the summons.
The trial court may set a later date for serving the affidavit for good cause shown by the plaintiff.
The trial court must dismiss the case without prejudice, on motion by the defendant, for a plaintiff's failure to timely serve the affidavit or move for good cause.
A plaintiff may move for good cause as late as in response to the defendant's motion to dismiss.

Good Bird v. Twin Buttes School District, et al. 2007 ND 103
Docket No.: 20070041
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The party resisting a summary judgment motion may not simply rely upon the pleadings or upon unsupported, conclusory allegations, but must present competent admissible evidence by affidavit or other comparable means which raises an issue of material fact.
A contract is either express or implied. An express contract is one the terms of which are stated in words. An implied contract is one the existence and terms of which are manifested by conduct. Under contracts implied in fact, the court merely attempts to determine from the surrounding circumstances what the parties actually intended.
Public employees who have legitimate expectations of continued government employment possess property interests of which they cannot be deprived without due process.

Interest of D.C.S.H.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)(CONSOLIDATED w/20060338) 2007 ND 102
Docket No.: 20060337
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Juvenile - Termination of Parental Rights
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The fundamental requirement of due process is the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.
A prisoner's due process rights are generally satisfied if the prisoner is represented at a parental-rights-termination hearing by counsel and has an opportunity to appear by deposition or other discovery technique.
In general, there is no denial of due process when the parent testifies at a termination hearing by telephone and is represented by court-appointed counsel during the proceeding.
A North Dakota district court does not have authority to order another state to allow a prisoner to appear in a civil case.

Wagner v. Wagner 2007 ND 101
Docket No.: 20060228
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: After including all of the parties' marital assets, the court must consider the Ruff-Fischer guidelines in its distribution of the parties' assets.
A long-term marriage supports an equal distribution of property. Liquidation of an ongoing farming operation is ordinarily a last resort.
Property division and spousal support are interrelated and intertwined and often must be considered together.

State v. Voigt 2007 ND 100
Docket No.: 20060271
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A double jeopardy claim is timely if it is raised before or during trial proceedings.
Jeopardy attaches in a jury trial when the jury is empaneled and sworn.
Nonexclusive factors for determining whether termination of a criminal trial is supported by manifest necessity include: 1) whether counsel were afforded an opportunity to be heard on the issue; 2) whether alternatives to a mistrial were explored; and 3) whether the judge's decision was made after sufficient reflection.
Mistrials declared with the defendant's consent generally do not bar later prosecutions.
A terminating event occurs under the "continuing jeopardy" doctrine if a trial before a new tribunal reasonably implicates the policies of the double jeopardy clause.

State v. Fehl-Haber 2007 ND 99
Docket No.: 20060086
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court has broad discretion in evidentiary matters, and its decision to admit or exclude evidence will not be overturned unless there has been an abuse of discretion.
In a criminal trial, all communications with the jurors after the jurors have retired for deliberations must be made in open court and in the presence of the defendant.
A criminal defendant may waive the right to have all communications with the jurors made after the case has been submitted to them by failing to object to the trial court's procedure in responding to the jury's request.
To prevail on a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the defendant must show: (1) the evidence was discovered after trial, (2) the failure to learn about the evidence at the time of trial was not the result of the defendant's lack of diligence, (3) the newly discovered evidence is material to the issues at trial, and (4) the weight and quality of the newly discovered evidence would likely result in an acquittal.
Where a sexual assault victim's credibility is not in issue, evidence that the victim made a similar accusation against another individual is immaterial and not likely to result in an acquittal.

State v. Flatt 2007 ND 98
Docket No.: 20060330
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Elements to an offense cannot be retroactively applied unless the Legislature expressly declares its intention to do so.
A charging document must sufficiently describe an offense based on the law in effect at the time the conduct occurred.
A defendant is not entitled to relief based on defective charging documents if the documents sufficiently allege an offense, based on the law in effect at the time the criminal conduct occurred, and the district court has jurisdiction over the matter.

State v. Silbernagel 2007 ND 97
Docket No.: 20070007
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Drugs/Contraband
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of motion to suppress evidence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (3).

Moore v. State 2007 ND 96
Docket No.: 20060224
Filing Date: 6/26/2007
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Post-conviction relief may be granted when "[e]vidence, not previously presented and heard, exists requiring vacation of the conviction or sentence in the interest of justice."
When a defendant applies for post-conviction relief to withdraw a guilty plea, the application is treated as one made under N.D.R.Crim.P. 32(d), and withdrawal is allowed when necessary to correct a manifest injustice.