Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5041 - 5050 of 12358 results
State v. Oliver (Consolidated w/20060083, 20060084 & 20060085)
2006 ND 241 Highlight: A faded temporary registration certificate with no visible printing is indicative of a temporary certificate that is more than thirty days old and provides an objective fact giving an officer a right to stop a vehicle to check its validity. |
Eifert v. Eifert
2006 ND 240 Highlight: In deciding custody, a district court may consider the child's interaction and interrelationships with a party's extended family and others who may significantly affect the child's best interests. |
State v. Doohen
2006 ND 239
Highlight: A warrantless search is unreasonable unless it falls within a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. |
Glasser v. Glasser
2006 ND 238
Highlight: An order dismissing an order to show cause why a party should not be held in contempt of court is appealable. |
Genter v. Workforce Safety & Ins. Fund, et al.
2006 ND 237
Highlight: Workforce Safety and Insurance must determine whether a medical assessment team is required in a particular case based on the nature of the claimed injury. |
Klein v. Larson
2006 ND 236
Highlight: In an initial custody decision, the trial court must award custody to the parent who will better promote the best interests and welfare of the child. |
Silbernagel, et al. v. Silbernagel, et al.
2006 ND 235 Highlight: Summary judgment in a quiet title action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
State v. Morrell
2006 ND 234 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered upon a conditional guilty plea to the offense of carrying a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Otto v. State (Cross-Ref. w/20030368)
2006 ND 233 Highlight: Denial of post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Wishek v. Kaseman
2006 ND 232 Highlight: A judgment granting summary judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |