Opinions

Wilson v. Ibarra 2006 ND 151
Docket No.: 20050357
Filing Date: 7/18/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: To justify a termination of all visitation, physical or emotional harm resulting from the visitation must be demonstrated in detail.

State v. Entzi 2006 ND 150
Docket No.: 20060066
Filing Date: 7/18/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of a motion to terminate probation is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).

Guardianship and Conservatorship of Johnson 2006 ND 149
Docket No.: 20060021
Filing Date: 7/5/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Guardian/Conservator
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: An order appointing co-guardians and co-conservators with unlimited authority to make decisions for the ward is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).

Disciplinary Board v. Korsmo 2006 ND 148
Docket No.: 20060054
Filing Date: 6/30/2006
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer suspension ordered.

Rekkedal v. Feist 2006 ND 147
Docket No.: 20050430
Filing Date: 6/30/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Crothers, Daniel John

Highlight: Dismissal of a lawsuit for failure to timely file the complaint requires that the demand to file has been served under N.D.R.Civ.P. 4(d); N.D.R.Civ.P. 5 service of the demand is not sufficient.
A party will be sanctioned for including in its appendix material not in the district court record.

Disciplinary Board v. Aakre 2006 ND 146
Docket No.: 20050382
Filing Date: 6/29/2006
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Interim suspension of lawyer ordered.

Estate of Sorenson 2006 ND 145
Docket No.: 20050350
Filing Date: 6/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: No acknowledgment or promise is sufficient evidence of a new or continuing contract to preclude operation of the statute of limitations unless the acknowledgment or promise is contained in a writing signed by the party to be charged.
Whenever services are rendered by one family member for another, a presumption arises that the services are gratuitous and that compensation was not intended, and a claimant has the burden to rebut the presumption by proof that the services were not gratuitous, which may be established by proof that the parties expressly or impliedly agreed the claimant would be compensated.

State ex rel. Bd. of University and School Lands v. Alexander, et al. 2006 ND 144
Docket No.: 20050409
Filing Date: 6/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Landlord/Tenant
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The parties to a prior foreclosure action and their assigns are bound by a judgment in the prior action under principles of res judicata.
The Pembina Nation Little Shell Band of North America is not a federally recognized Indian tribe.

Interest of J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2006 ND 143
Docket No.: 20060156
Filing Date: 6/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: Mentally ill persons who require treatment are entitled to the least restrictive treatment that will meet their treatment needs.
When deciding whether alternative treatment to hospitalization is adequate, the district court is required to make a two-part inquiry: (1) whether a treatment program other than hospitalization is adequate to meet the individual's treatment needs; and (2) whether an alternative treatment program is sufficient to prevent harm or injuries that an individual may inflict on himself or others.
When available alternative treatment programs are insufficient to prevent harm or injures that an individual may inflict on himself or others, less restrictive treatment cannot be ordered.

DeMers v. DeMers 2006 ND 142
Docket No.: 20050184
Filing Date: 6/29/2006
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The statutory presumption against awarding custody to the perpetrator of domestic violence applies when the district court finds there is credible evidence of domestic violence and at least one incident of domestic violence resulted in serious bodily injury or involved the use of a dangerous weapon, or there is a pattern of domestic violence within a reasonable proximity to the proceeding.
A party waives the right to appeal a divorce judgment if she unconditionally, voluntarily, and consciously accepts the benefits of the judgment.
The district court must adequately explain a substantial disparity in a property distribution.