Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5071 - 5080 of 12382 results
Silbernagel, et al. v. Silbernagel, et al.
2006 ND 235 Highlight: Summary judgment in a quiet title action is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
State v. Morrell
2006 ND 234 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered upon a conditional guilty plea to the offense of carrying a loaded firearm in a motor vehicle is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
Otto v. State (Cross-Ref. w/20030368)
2006 ND 233 Highlight: Denial of post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Wishek v. Kaseman
2006 ND 232 Highlight: A judgment granting summary judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Trinity Hospitals v. Mattson, et al.
2006 ND 231
Highlight: The Supreme Court's authority to issue a supervisory writ is a discretionary power exercised rarely, cautiously, and only in extraordinary cases to rectify errors and to prevent injustice when no adequate alternative remedy exists. |
Disciplinary Board v. Aakre
2006 ND 230 Highlight: Suspension of lawyer ordered. |
Tverberg v. Workforce Safety & Insurance, et al.
2006 ND 229
Highlight: The rehabilitation provisions of workers compensation law are intended to return injured workers to substantial gainful employment with a minium of retraining as soon as possible after a work injury, but those provisions do not require complete rehabilitation to preinjury earning capacity. |
Disciplinary Board v. Bullis
2006 ND 228
Highlight: Attorney suspended from practice of law for 90 days, ordered to complete six hours of non-self-study continuing legal education courses on conflicts of interest within the next two years in addition to the mandatory CLE requirements, and ordered to pay costs and expenses of proceedings. |
State v. Buchholz (Consol. w/20060061) (Cross-ref. w/20040118)
2006 ND 227
Highlight: A mistake of law defense generally is not an available defense for strict liability offenses. |
Unterseher v. Ziegler
2006 ND 226 Highlight: Suspension of driving privileges is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5). |