Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5601 - 5610 of 12382 results
State v. Mathre
2004 ND 149
Highlight: The appellant must provide a transcript on appeal, and the appellant suffers any consequences resulting from the lack of a transcript to review. |
Johnson v. ND Dept. of Transportation
2004 ND 148 Highlight: An officer who properly arrests a driver for DUI and who obtains, within the officer's jurisdiction, the driver's consent to submit to a blood test can transport the arrestee outside the jurisdiction for the test. |
State v. Stockert
2004 ND 146
Highlight: A judge is required to disqualify if the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or a party's lawyer, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceedings. |
Minn-Kota Ag Products, Inc., et al. v. Carlson, et al.
2004 ND 145
Highlight: Issues of fact may become questions of law if a reasonable person could reach only one conclusion from the facts. |
State v. Sims (Consolidated w/20040036)
2004 ND 144 Highlight: The district court may provide for the possibility of work release in accordance with the guidelines of a correctional facility. |
Ag Acceptance Corp. v. Alexander Farms, Inc., et al.
2004 ND 143 Highlight: Judgment in collection action summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6). |
Interest of T.J.L. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2004 ND 142
Highlight: Effective March 1, 2004, findings of fact in juvenile matters will not be set aside on appeal unless clearly erroneous. |
Oppegard-Gessler v. Gessler
2004 ND 141
Highlight: A custodial parent may not change the residence of a child to another state except upon order of the court or with the consent of the noncustodial parent, if the noncustodial parent has been given visitation rights by the decree. |
State v. Smestad
2004 ND 140 Highlight: A trial court may allow testimony as to the context of events, if the testimony is required to prove the essential statutory elements of the crime and the district court has weighed the probative value against the prejudicial nature of the testimony. |
State v. Decoteau
2004 ND 139
Highlight: The reasonable suspicion standard does not require an officer to rule out every potential innocent excuse for the behavior in question before stopping a vehicle for investigation. |