Opinions

Interest of K.G. (CONFIDENTIAL) 2004 ND 182
Docket No.: 20040264
Filing Date: 10/12/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Mental Health
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: A district court order revoking alternative treatment and requiring treatment at the State Hospital is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

Ernst v. Burdick, et al. (Consolidated w/20040105) 2004 ND 181
Docket No.: 20040104
Filing Date: 10/12/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: The statutory provisions for criminal history record collection and dissemination under N.D.C.C. ch. 12-60 do not create a private cause of action for violations.

Disciplinary Board v. Secrest 2004 ND 180
Docket No.: 20040243
Filing Date: 10/4/2004
Case Type: Discipline - Attorney - Original Proceeding
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Lawyer reprimanded and ordered to pay costs of disciplinary proceedings for violating N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.4(b).

Hansen, et al. v. Scott, et al. (Cross-reference w/20010195) 2004 ND 179
Docket No.: 20040044
Filing Date: 9/23/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: When applying principles of comity, it is not against North Dakota public policy to grant a sister state's employees the same level of immunity North Dakota state employees enjoy.

Evenson v. Quantum Industries, Inc., et al. 2004 ND 178
Docket No.: 20040033
Filing Date: 9/17/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The parol evidence rule precludes the use of evidence of prior oral negotiations and agreements to vary or add to the terms expressed in a written contract.
Preliminary oral statements and promises related to the terms of the contract do not provide the basis for a fraud claim if there is a subsequent written contract.

Jackson v. State 2004 ND 177
Docket No.: 20030365
Filing Date: 9/15/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Denial of application for post-conviction relief based on alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Lee 2004 ND 176
Docket No.: 20030336
Filing Date: 9/15/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Misdemeanor
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: If a party does not object to an alleged error at the time it occurs, and does not give the court time to remedy any possible prejudice that may result, the party waives any ground of complaint against its admission upon appeal.
If a party does not object to an alleged error during trial, the party alleging an error has the burden of proving the alleged error was obvious by showing it is plain and it affects substantial rights of the party. The alleged error is not obvious unless it is a clear deviation from an applicable legal rule under current law.

City of Wahpeton v. Timmerman (Consolidated w/ 20040076 & 20040077) 2004 ND 175
Docket No.: 20040075
Filing Date: 9/15/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Convictions of driving without a license and resisting arrest and subsequent denials of motions to dismiss charges and withdraw guilty pleas are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), (2) and (4).

Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. v. Wamsley, et al. 2004 ND 174
Docket No.: 20030374
Filing Date: 9/13/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Insurance
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: The significant-contacts approach to choice-of-law questions is appropriate in contract cases with multistate factual contacts.
In insurance contract cases, consideration of predictability of results favors application of the law of the state in which the insurance policy was negotiated, issued, and the premiums paid.

Flatt v. Kantak, et al. 2004 ND 173
Docket No.: 20030285
Filing Date: 9/3/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A physician must disclose material risks to obtain a patient's informed consent for a medical procedure.
On appeal, a trial court's rulings on expert testimony are reviewed under the abuse-of-discretion standard.
A trial court is not required to instruct a jury in the exact language sought by a party if the court's instructions correctly and adequately inform the jury of the applicable law.
A physician's duty of disclosure in an informed consent case is measured under the reasonable patient standard.
A party challenging the constitutionality of a statute must allege an injury traceable to the statute.