Opinions

State v. McClary 2004 ND 98
Docket No.: 20030237
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A jury verdict is inconsistent when, under the jury instructions and evidence, the verdict cannot be rationally reconciled.
A trial court may not question the jury about how it arrived at its verdict.

Tibert, et al. v. City of Minto, et al. (Cross ref. w/20030208) 2004 ND 97
Docket No.: 20030207
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: A district court's legal conclusion of mootness is reviewed de novo.
A common-law dedication must be proven by clear and convincing evidence. The party attempting to establish the existence of the common-law dedication must show there was an intention to dedicate and a public acceptance of the dedication.
Whether a common-law dedication occurred is a question of fact which will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous.

Haley v. Dennis, et al. 2004 ND 96
Docket No.: 20030284
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Malpractice
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: A jury verdict that assesses a percentage of fault to the defendant after finding the defendant was not negligent is an inconsistent and irreconcilable verdict.
When the jury during deliberations requests additional instruction on a substantive point of law, the court must notify the parties or counsel before responding to the jury's request.

Hilgers v. Hilgers (Cross-reference w/ 20010208) 2004 ND 95
Docket No.: 20030252
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: N.D.R.Civ.P. 6(e), permitting an additional three days to be added to the time for service by mail, does not apply to extend the time when the time begins to run only after actual receipt of notice.
A letter opinion is not an appealable order unless followed by a subsequently entered consistent judgment or order.
The Supreme Court exercises its supervisory authority only to rectify errors and prevent injustice when no adequate alternative remedies exist.
A district court abuses its discretion when it fails to address nonfrivolous issues presented to the court.

Jaste v. Gailfus, et al. 2004 ND 94
Docket No.: 20030261
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A court errs by deciding summary judgment on a legal doctrine other than those raised by the parties unless the parties are given notice and an opportunity to be heard. The error is reversible if not harmless.

Wetsch v. ND Dept. of Transportation 2004 ND 93
Docket No.: 20030254
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Administrative - Department of Transportation
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Refusal to submit to an onsite screening test constitutes a violation of informed consent law and may properly result in a one-year suspension of an individual's driver's license.
An individual's demand to have blood drawn for a chemical screening in a medical environment, such as a hospital, constitutes refusal under North Dakota's informed consent statute.

Airport Inn Enterprises, Inc. v. Ramage 2004 ND 92
Docket No.: 20040032
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A condition precedent is one that must be performed or happen before a duty of immediate performance arises on the promise that the condition qualifies.
When an agreement is conditioned upon obtaining financing, a condition precedent to performance of the agreement is created.
When financing is a condition precedent, there is no enforceable agreement until the financing is obtained.

All New Gutter Service, Inc. v. Dusek 2004 ND 91
Docket No.: 20030321
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Judgment finding no oral contract after a bench trial is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

State v. Tweeten 2004 ND 90
Docket No.: 20030151
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Misc. Felony
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: A district court may not dismiss a case with prejudice for prosecutorial misconduct unless a hearing is held in which it is determined by clear and convincing evidence the prosecution has proceeded in bad faith.

Meyer v. Meyer 2004 ND 89
Docket No.: 20030214
Filing Date: 5/5/2004
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Divorce - Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A change in spousal support, which was initially awarded upon the parties' stipulation, should be made only with great reluctance by the trial court upon a showing of a material change in circumstances.
Findings of fact should be sufficiently stated so the reviewing court is able to understand the factual basis for the trial court's decision, particularly in view of our standards for modification of spousal support.
A case will be remanded if the reviewing court cannot discern the rationale for the result reached by the trial court.