Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
5661 - 5670 of 12418 results
City of Minot v. Kary (Consolidated w/20030344)
2004 ND 123 Highlight: Convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol and unlawful consumption of alcohol are summarily affirmed under 35.1(a)(3) and (4). |
State v. Kokron
2004 ND 122 Highlight: Judgment and sentence for gross sexual imposition are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). |
State v. Mikkelson
2004 ND 121 Highlight: Driving under suspension conviction is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
T.E.J. v. T.S., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2004 ND 120
Highlight: The court may impute income to determine an obligor's future support obligation when the obligor has made a voluntary change in employment. |
Dietz v. Kautzman (Cross-Ref w/980004, 990386, 20000083, 20020296, 20030038)
2004 ND 119
Highlight: The 21-day safe harbor provision under N.D.R.Civ.P. 11 can be waived by a party against whom sanctions are sought for bringing a frivolous claim, when the party continues to advance the claim rather than withdraw or appropriately correct it. |
Fladeland, et al. v. Gudbranson, et al.
2004 ND 118
Highlight: An agreement for the sale of real property is invalid unless the same or some note or memorandum thereof is in writing and subscribed by the party to be charged, or by his agent. |
Ritter, Laber & Assoc., et al. v. Koch Oil, et al. (Cross w/990204 & 20000224)
2004 ND 117
Highlight: A claim for conversion may arise under the same facts as a claim for a breach of contract. |
Greybull v. State (cross-ref. w/970216; 990280; 20020204)
2004 ND 116
Highlight: Raising issues in an application for post-conviction relief that were not raised on direct appeal or in prior applications for post-conviction relief, absent any showing of excuse or justification is an abuse of process. |
State v. Higgins
2004 ND 115
Highlight: Under N.D.R.Crim.P. 3(b), allowing amendment of a complaint is within the trial court's discretion. |
City of Mandan v. Sperle
2004 ND 114
Highlight: In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction, the appellate court will not weigh conflicting evidence or judge the credibility of witnesses but will look only to the evidence most favorable to the verdict and to the reasonable inferences therefrom to determine whether there is substantial evidence to warrant a conviction. |