Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6201 - 6210 of 12358 results
Gale v. ND Bd. of Podiatric Medicine
2001 ND 141 Highlight: A party to an administrative proceeding may waive the right to an appeal. |
Lapp v. ND Dept. of Transportation
2001 ND 140
Highlight: In determining whether an officer had a reasonable and articulable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop, the test is whether a reasonable person in the officer's position would be justified by some objective manifestation in suspecting potential criminal activity. |
Rodenburg, et al. v. Fargo-Moorhead Y.M.C.A., et al.
2001 ND 139
Highlight: In reviewing a jury's findings, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and the court determines only if substantial evidence supports it. |
Selzler v. Selzler
2001 ND 138
Highlight: A court, for good cause, may excuse a custody investigator from attending the entire proceedings, but only if the court makes reasonable accommodations to preserve the parties' right to examine the investigator in light of all of the testimony given. |
Interest of R.O., et al. (CONFIDENTIAL)(CONSOLIDATED W/20000307)
2001 ND 137
Highlight: In a parental-rights-termination proceeding alleging reports of child abuse or neglect, N.D.C.C. 50-25.1-10 abrogates the physician-patient and psychotherapist-patient privilege in N.D.R.Ev. 503. |
State v. Heitzmann (Cross-Ref. w/20000312)
2001 ND 136
Highlight: There is no automatic-search rule for companions of an arrestee. |
State v. Kelly
2001 ND 135
Highlight: Inmate disciplinary proceedings and the resulting consequences are civil in nature. |
Name Change of State Bar Board to Board of Law Examiners
2001 ND 134 |
State v. Holte, et al.
2001 ND 133 Highlight: It is an affirmative defense to the strict liability crime of violating a domestic violence protection order that the defendant's acts were innocent or mistaken. |
State v. Miller
2001 ND 132
Highlight: A trial court does not abuse its discretion or violate the defendant's right to present a defense when it excludes hearsay evidence about a dream the child-victim had about another male relative. |