Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6231 - 6240 of 12358 results
Interest of A.B. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2001 ND 111 Highlight: If juvenile delinquency proceedings are begun in a court other than in the county of the child's residence, that court must transfer the proceedings for disposition to the juvenile court of the county of the child's residence, if the child has been adjudicated delinquent and other proceedings involving the child are pending in that court. |
Moen, et al. v. Thomas, et al. (CROSS-REFERENCE W/20000169)
2001 ND 110 Highlight: The existence of an attorney-client relationship is ordinarily a question of fact. |
Johnson v. Johnson
2001 ND 109
Highlight: A finding by the trial court as to future intentions of a party is not affected by a subsequent decision by that party to engage in conduct contrary to the finding, and the subsequent conduct does not constitute grounds for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. |
Demming v. Demming
2001 ND 108 |
State v. Abnar (CONSOLIDATED w/20000288)
2001 ND 107 Highlight: Judgments of conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). |
State v. Aune (cross-ref. w/20020106)
2001 ND 106 Highlight: The trial court's judgment of conviction for a violation of N.D.C.C. 12.1-10-05 is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). |
State v. Schwartz
2001 ND 105 Highlight: Jury verdict of guilty on two counts of misdemeanor sexual assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4). |
Jorgenson, et al. v. Agway, Inc.
2001 ND 104 Highlight: North Dakota's Consumer Fraud Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 51-15, applies to a farmer who purchases confection sunflower seed for use in cultivating a sunflower crop for subsequent sale and who alleges the seed is defective and marketed in violation of the Act. |
Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, et al.
2001 ND 103
Highlight: The discovery rule tolls the statute of limitations in malpractice actions until the plaintiff knows, or with reasonable diligence should know, of the injury, its cause, and the defendant's possible negligence. |
Remmick v. Whitman, et al.
2001 ND 102 Highlight: The interest of a recorded mineral deed grantee, who is not a named party in a subsequent action to foreclose a mortgage on the real property, is not affected by the foreclosure action. |