Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6261 - 6270 of 12279 results
|
Owens v. State (CONSOLIDATED W/20000129) (CROSS-REF SEE DOCKET MEMO)
2001 ND 15 Highlight: Post-conviction relief is denied for misuse of process when a petitioner presents issues the petitioner inexcusably failed to raise in a previous post-conviction hearing. |
|
State ex rel. Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation v. Haskell, et al.
2001 ND 14
Highlight: The Supreme Court exercises its discretionary authority to issue supervisory writs on a case-by-case basis, rarely and cautiously, and only to rectify errors and prevent injustice in extraordinary cases in which there is no adequate alternative remedy. |
|
Hurt v. Hurt
2001 ND 13
Highlight: Evidence of domestic violence which does not trigger the statutory presumption under N.D.C.C. 14-09-06.2(1)(j) remains one of the best interest factors to be considered by the court. |
|
City of Harvey v. Fettig
2001 ND 12 Highlight: The prosecutor's statement supporting an appeal from a suppression order cannot be a mere paraphrase of the statutory language, but must explain the relevance of and need for the evidence which was suppressed. |
|
Nord, et al. v. Herrman, et al.
2001 ND 11
Highlight: Any survey method that results in equitable allocation of a new shoreline in proportion to each owner's share of the original shoreline will satisfy the legal requirement of proportional allocation. |
|
Interest of J.S. (CONFIDENTIAL-M.H.)
2001 ND 10
Highlight: Expedited appeals under the mental health law are limited to the procedures, findings, and conclusions of the lower court. Because of this limited review, detailed findings are necessary. |
|
Clark v. State
2001 ND 9 Highlight: Under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 2355 (2000), any fact, other than prior convictions, that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be found by a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. |
|
Doyle v. Sprynczynatyk
2001 ND 8 Highlight: Points on a driving record must be reduced for completion of a defensive driver course only if the points are accumulated prior to completing the course. Points accumulate when entered on the driving record, not at the date of the traffic citation or conviction. |
|
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2001 ND 7 Highlight: A lawyer's conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation generally results in suspension from the practice of law. |
|
Reiser v. Reiser
2001 ND 6
Highlight: In dividing the marital estate, fault causing deterioration of the marriage is a relevant factor under the Ruff-Fischer guidelines. |