Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6251 - 6260 of 12358 results
McDowell, et al. v. Gillie, et al.
2001 ND 91
Highlight: Stopping at the scene of an accident and inquiring whether any assistance is needed can constitute the rendering of aid and assistance within the meaning of the Good Samaritan Act. |
James, et al. v. Griffin, et al.
2001 ND 90 Highlight: Once prior acquiescence of a boundary has been destroyed by a nonacquiescent possession, the 20-year period for establishing acquiescence begins running anew. |
Kinzley v. Kinzley
2001 ND 89 Highlight: The trial court's judgment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Fox v. Fox (cross-ref. w/980198)
2001 ND 88
Highlight: A choice between two permissible views of the evidence is not clearly erroneous when the trial court's findings are based either on physical or documentary evidence or inferences from other facts or on credibility determinations. |
Estate of Murphy, et al. v. Maus, et al.
2001 ND 87 Highlight: To prevail in a legal malpractice action, a plaintiff must establish the attorney's malpractice proximately caused damage to the plaintiff. |
Disciplinary Board v. Howe
2001 ND 86
Highlight: An attorney is appropriately suspended from the practice of law for 120 days when the hearing panel has found clear and convincing evidence of professional conduct violations involving lack of diligence, communication, and expediting litigation, as well as a disciplinary history of five prior disciplinary sanctions. |
Davis v. State
2001 ND 85 Highlight: A trial court is authorized to resentence a defendant who violates conditions of probation to any sentence that was initially available. Resentencing a defendant to a harsher sentence than his original sentence imposed does not violate double jeopardy or due process. |
State v. Ellis (Cross-reference w/20000006)
2001 ND 84
Highlight: A defendant seeking a change of venue under N.D.R.Crim.P. 21 has the burden of establishing a reasonable likelihood of prejudice so pervasive that a fair and impartial jury cannot be selected in the county of original venue. |
Interest of C.R.C. (CONFIDENTIAL)
2001 ND 83 Highlight: Termination of parental rights is appropriate when the State proves by clear and convincing evidence that a child is deprived and the deprivation is not due primarily to a lack of financial resources; the causes and conditions of the deprivation will likely continue or will not be remedied; and the child is suffering, or will probably suffer, serious physical, mental, moral, or emotional harm from the deprivation. |
State v. Paulson, et al.
2001 ND 82 Highlight: The failure of the parents of an injured person "incapacitated by the injury from giving the notice" to present the director of the office of management and budget a notice of claim within 180 days of discovery of the injury does not preclude the injured person from suing the State. |