Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
6251 - 6260 of 12446 results
McDowell v. McDowell
2001 ND 176
Highlight: Spousal support determinations must be made in light of the income and needs of the disadvantaged spouse and of the supporting spouse's needs and ability to pay. |
City of Fargo v. Ellison
2001 ND 175
Highlight: Police should not be placed in a worse position then they occupied before the illegal search occurred. |
Voge v. Schnaidt
2001 ND 174 Highlight: An action for damages for an injury received in a collision of two boats on Lake Sakakawea is governed by the three-year statute of limitations in federal law, rather than the six-year limitation in state law. |
State v. Lynch
2001 ND 173 Highlight: The introduction of the state toxicologist's list of approved designations medically qualified to draw blood is a foundational requirement for the introduction of blood test results. |
Farmers Elevator, Inc. of Grace City v. Custom Processors, Inc.
2001 ND 172 Highlight: Judgment in a contract action summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
Bell v. State
2001 ND 171 Highlight: Denial of post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7). |
Klein v. ND Workers Comp. Bureau, et al.
2001 ND 170 Highlight: The time period to file a claim for worker's compensation benefits begins on the first day a reasonable person, not learned in medicine, knew or should have known that the injury was work related. |
Schmidt v. Ward Co. S.S.B., et al. (CONSOLIDATED W/2001114)
2001 ND 169
Highlight: A conservatorship is a legal device similar to a trust under the law for determining medicaid eligibility. |
Dakota Partners v. Glopak, Inc., et al.
2001 ND 168 Highlight: A contract provision prohibiting "offset" is not a waiver of the defense of fraud in the procurement of the contract. |
Twogood v. Wentz, et al.
2001 ND 167
Highlight: Satisfaction of a cost judgment after an execution has been issued does not bar an appeal to reverse a summary judgment on the merits. |