Opinions

Anderson v. Meyer Broadcasting Co. 2001 ND 125
Docket No.: 20000322
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: An employee alleging age discrimination under the North Dakota Human Rights Act must establish she is at least forty years old and persons under forty years old were treated more favorably.
An employee alleging disparate treatment sex discrimination under the Human Rights Act must identify specific instances in which persons situated similarly in all relevant aspects were treated differently.
An employee alleging retaliatory discharge bears the burden of showing she engaged in protected activity, her employer took adverse action against her, and there was a causal connection between her protected activity and the employer's adverse action.

Hoverson v. Hoverson 2001 ND 124
Docket No.: 20000227
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: Economic misconduct requires misconduct which results in waste of marital assets or reduction of the net marital estate.
A trial court must provide sufficient explanation for its property distribution to permit a reviewing court to determine the basis for its distribution.
In calculating an obligor's deduction from net income for tax obligations, a hypothetical federal income tax obligation specified in the child support guidelines must be used..

Myer, et al. v. Rygg 2001 ND 123
Docket No.: 20000257
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Personal Injury
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: A trial court's decision on qualification of a witness as an expert will not be reversed on appeal unless it was an abuse of discretion.
If an expert's knowledge, training, education, and experience will assist the trier of fact, the expert need not be a specialist in a highly particularized field or have a formal title or particular license.
The trial court has wide discretion to determine an appropriate sanction for violation of discovery rules.

Berg v. Dakota Boys Ranch Assoc. 2001 ND 122
Docket No.: 20000301
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Employer/Employee Dispute
Author: Neumann, William

Highlight: If summary judgment is denied, the proper procedure is to move for judgment as a matter of law at the close of the evidence, and the denial of that motion may be reviewed on appeal.
A party raising an argument in a summary judgment motion but abandoning the argument at trial has not preserved the issue for appellate review.
A trial court does not err in admitting a release into evidence if the release was offered for a purpose other than proving liability or the amount of the claim.

Flattum-Riemers v. Peters-Riemers (CONFIDENTIAL) 2001 ND 121
Docket No.: 20000349
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Other
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A request for district court review of a judicial referee's findings and order need not specifically recite every issue raised before the referee to preserve those issues for appellate review.
A trial court may allow the filing of affidavits and documents less than 24 hours before a hearing.
Denial of a continuance because of the absence of a material witness is proper when the moving party does not show what the witness would testify to if present, or that the facts desired cannot be proven by other available witnesses, and when there is no showing of diligence to secure the testimony of the witness by deposition or personal appearance at trial.

State v. Schneeweiss 2001 ND 120
Docket No.: 20000295
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Defendants have the right to court-appointed counsel at public expense in all felony cases and in all non-felony cases, unless the sentence upon conviction will not include imprisonment, only if they are eligible under the guidelines governing indigency.
Non-indigent defendants also have the right to court-appointed counsel, at their own expense, if they are unable to secure the assistance of counsel.
A trial court has discretion to substitute appointed counsel if a defendant shows good cause for the substitution.
A trial court has discretion to determine whether to grant a continuance of trial to change counsel and may consider the time required for trial preparation and the diligence of the moving party.
Defendants may voluntarily waive their right to counsel, or their conduct may be the functional equivalent of a voluntary waiver, but the waiver must be made knowingly and intelligently.

Tweit v. Erickson 2001 ND 119
Docket No.: 20010055
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Per Curiam

Braunagel v. City of Devils Lake 2001 ND 118
Docket No.: 20000342
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: Although declaratory and injunctive relief are available to challenge a city's failure to comply with the statutory requirements for annexation of property, they may not be used to test the wisdom of the annexation decision.
Government regulation of land use constitutes a "taking" for public use only when the owner has been deprived of all or substantially all reasonable uses of the property.

State v. Jensen (Consolidated w/20010013 & 20010014) 2001 ND 117
Docket No.: 20010012
Filing Date: 7/10/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - DUI/DUS/APC
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Criminal convictions for driving under revocation, driving under the influence, and false report to law enforcement summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

Trade 'N Post, L.L.C. v. World Duty Free Americas, Inc, et al. 2001 ND 116
Docket No.: 20000176
Filing Date: 6/14/2001
Case Type: Certified Question - Civil - Civil
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: In determining whether there is an implied private right of action under a state statute, the Court should consider whether the plaintiff is one of the class for whose especial benefit the statute was enacted, whether there is any indication of legislative intent to create such a remedy, and whether it is consistent with the underlying purposes of the legislative scheme to imply such a remedy.
The party urging an implied right of action bears the burden of proof to establish the legislature intended to create the remedy.
There is no implied private right of action for damages under the Unfair Discrimination Law, N.D.C.C. ch. 51-09, or the Unfair Trade Practices Law, N.D.C.C. ch. 51-10.
A common law tort claim for unlawful interference with business is recognized in this state.
The elements of a claim for unlawful interference with business are: (1) the existence of a valid business relationship or expectancy; (2) knowledge by the interferer of the relationship or expectancy; (3) an intentional and wrongful act of interference; (4) proof that the interference caused the harm sustained; and (5) actual damages to the plaintiff.
In order to recover for unlawful interference with business, the plaintiff must prove that the interfering conduct was independently tortious or in violation of statute.