Opinions

State v. Aune (cross-ref. w/20020106) 2001 ND 106
Docket No.: 20000294
Filing Date: 6/8/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Other
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: The trial court's judgment of conviction for a violation of N.D.C.C. 12.1-10-05 is affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

State v. Schwartz 2001 ND 105
Docket No.: 20000339
Filing Date: 6/8/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Criminal - Sexual Offense
Author: Per Curiam

Highlight: Jury verdict of guilty on two counts of misdemeanor sexual assault is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), (4).

Jorgenson, et al. v. Agway, Inc. 2001 ND 104
Docket No.: 20000300
Filing Date: 5/25/2001
Case Type: Certified Question - Civil - Civil
Author: VandeWalle, Gerald

Highlight: North Dakota's Consumer Fraud Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 51-15, applies to a farmer who purchases confection sunflower seed for use in cultivating a sunflower crop for subsequent sale and who alleges the seed is defective and marketed in violation of the Act.

Larson v. Norkot Manufacturing, et al. 2001 ND 103
Docket No.: 20000321
Filing Date: 5/24/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: The discovery rule tolls the statute of limitations in malpractice actions until the plaintiff knows, or with reasonable diligence should know, of the injury, its cause, and the defendant's possible negligence.
To trigger the running of the statute of limitations, a plaintiff need not fully appreciate the potential liability or be convinced of his or her injury, but need only know enough to be on notice of a potential claim.

Remmick v. Whitman, et al. 2001 ND 102
Docket No.: 20000364
Filing Date: 5/24/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Real Property
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The interest of a recorded mineral deed grantee, who is not a named party in a subsequent action to foreclose a mortgage on the real property, is not affected by the foreclosure action.

Triple Quest, Inc. v. Cleveland Gear Co., Inc. 2001 ND 101
Docket No.: 20000281
Filing Date: 5/24/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Contracts
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: An order dismissing an action without prejudice on the ground that jurisdiction or venue is proper in another state based on a contractual forum selection clause is appealable.
When an interest has been transferred during an action, the transferee need not be substituted or joined as a party to have standing to pursue an appeal.

Estate of Schmidt (cross-ref. w/970183) 2001 ND 100
Docket No.: 20000258
Filing Date: 5/24/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Probate, Wills, Trusts
Author:

Highlight: Appeal of eleven orders in probate case summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1) (appeal is frivolous and completely without merit).

State ex rel. Olson v. Harrison, et al. 2001 ND 99
Docket No.: 20000282
Filing Date: 5/22/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Torts (Negligence, Liab., Nuis.)
Author: Maring, Mary

Highlight: The State has not consented to suit without proper service of process.
Where no official with authority to accept service of process for the State was served in accordance with N.D.R.Civ.P. 4, the State has not been properly served.
When a tribal court does not have personal jurisdiction over the State, the tribal court's order is not appropriate for recognition as a matter of comity.
When a tribal court's order is not appropriate for recognition as a matter of comity, the State is not required to exhaust remedies available in tribal court.

Christl v. Swanson (Cross-Ref. W/19990256) 2001 ND 98
Docket No.: 20000315
Filing Date: 5/22/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Child Support
Author: Kapsner, Carol

Highlight: Under the Child Support Guidelines, prior to the August 1, 1999 amendments, the district court could deduct from an obligor's adjusted gross income business costs actually incurred and paid, but not expensed for internal revenue purposes.

Eaton v. State 2001 ND 97
Docket No.: 20010003
Filing Date: 5/22/2001
Case Type: Appeal - Civil - Post-Conviction Relief
Author: Sandstrom, Dale

Highlight: A criminal defendant waives nonjurisdictional defects by entering a knowing and voluntary guilty plea.
Violations of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act that do not deprive the district court of personal jurisdiction are waived by a guilty plea.
The burden of proving a basis for post-conviction relief rests on the petitioning defendant.