Opinions
On this page, you can search and view the Supreme Court’s opinions. If you wish to review the docket or documents filed in a matter, please go to the Court’s public portal search page.
21 - 30 of 12224 results
|
State v. Mogren
2026 ND 2
Highlight: When a container has been previously opened by a government agent under lawful authority, and there is no substantial likelihood its contents have changed, a warrantless search of that container by law enforcement does not violate the |
|
Pederson v. State
2026 ND 1
Highlight: Ineffective assistance of counsel claims ordinarily are unsuited for summary disposition and denial without an evidentiary hearing. |
|
State v. Lawrence
2025 ND 237 Highlight: A district court order denying a petition to return forfeited bail is affirmed. |
|
White Bird v. State
2025 ND 236 Highlight: A judgment denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
|
Tischmak v. Theurer, et al.
2025 ND 235
Highlight: District courts have wide judicial discretion in partition actions to do equity and to make a fair and just division of the property or proceeds between the parties, and great flexibility in fashioning appropriate relief for the parties. |
|
State v. Medina
2025 ND 234
Highlight: Rule 11(a)(2), N.D.R.Crim.P., addresses conditional guilty pleas and requires: (1) the defendant, any defendant's attorney and the prosecuting attorney consent in writing to the conditional plea; (2) the court accept the conditional plea and enter an order; and (3) the judgment specify the plea is conditional. |
|
State v. Solis
2025 ND 233
Highlight: A district court did not abuse its discretion by requiring registration as a sex offender. |
|
Bohe v. State
2025 ND 232 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) & (4). |
|
City of Williston v. Bauer
2025 ND 231 Highlight: The order denying the defendant's motion for recovery of attorney's fees and costs, brought in a criminal case after acquittal, is affirmed. |
|
Markestad v. Markestad, et al.
2025 ND 230
Highlight: The district court must state its findings of fact with sufficient specificity to enable a reviewing court to understand the factual basis for its decisions. |