Opinions
41 - 50 of 12445 results
WSI v. Oden
2020 ND 243
Highlight: Valid service of process is necessary to assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant. If a defendant challenges the court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving jurisdiction exists. The plaintiff must make a prima facie showing of jurisdiction to defeat a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. If the court relies only on pleadings and affidavits, the court must look at the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. |
Grengs v. Grengs
2020 ND 242
Highlight: The court lacked jurisdiction to resolve a motion to set aside a judgment during a pending appeal. |
State v. Vaagen
2020 ND 241
Highlight: The timely filing of a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional, and cannot be waived by the appellate court. |
Krolik v. Muscha
2020 ND 240 Highlight: Failure to observe proper hearing date provided in notice of hearing cannot be imputed to the district court. |
Interest of K.R.C.W.
2020 ND 239 Highlight: A juvenile court may terminate parental rights solely on a finding of deprivation when the child has been in foster care for at least four hundred fifty out of the previous six hundred sixty nights. |
Burden v. State
2020 ND 238 Highlight: A district court order denying an application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Gates
2020 ND 237 Highlight: An appeal may be dismissed when an appellant’s brief fails to provide a court with an opportunity to meaningfully review the alleged error. |
Estate of Lindvig
2020 ND 236
Highlight: Under N.D.C.C. § 47-10-23.1, a nontestamentary transfer of real property between spouses is conclusively presumed to be for consideration unless otherwise stated in writing. |
State, et al. v. P.K.
2020 ND 235
Highlight: In a child support action brought by the State on behalf of a parent, a counterclaim by the defendant seeking a determination of primary residential responsibility is not a counterclaim against the State for purposes of N.D.R.Civ.P. 13(d). |
MDU v. Behm
2020 ND 234
Highlight: Under the law of the case doctrine, a party cannot on a second appeal relitigate issues that were resolved in the first appeal or that would have been resolved had they been properly presented in the first appeal. |