Opinions
41 - 50 of 12776 results
Schrodt v. Schrodt, et al.
2022 ND 64
Highlight: The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the request for a continuance. |
Twin City Technical, et al. v. Williams Cty, et al.
2022 ND 63
Highlight: The law of the case doctrine applies when an appellate court has decided a legal question and remanded to the district court for further proceedings, and a party cannot on a second appeal relitigate issues which were resolved by the Court in the first appeal or which would have been resolved had they been properly presented in the first appeal. The mandate rule requires the district court to follow the appellate court’s pronouncements on legal issues in subsequent proceedings in the case and to carry the appellate court’s mandate into effect according to its terms. |
Adoption of A.A.H.
2022 ND 62 Highlight: An adoption decree terminating a father’s parental rights and granting a petition for adoption is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Canerdy v. Canerdy, et al.
2022 ND 61
Highlight: A district court’s contempt decision will only be disturbed on appeal if the court abused its discretion. |
Fourth v. State
2022 ND 60 Highlight: A district court order denying post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). |
State v. Bazile
2022 ND 59
Highlight: In reviewing a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, this Court first determines whether the prosecutor’s actions were misconduct, then examines whether the misconduct had a prejudicial effect. |
Interest of T.H.
2022 ND 58 Highlight: Juvenile court orders terminating parental rights are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). |
Kaspari v. Kaspari
2022 ND 57 Highlight: When spousal support is awarded, the district court is not required to provide a detailed calculation of the requesting spouse’s need for support, but the court is required to provide a discernable basis for its decision. |
State v. Almklov
2022 ND 56 Highlight: Criminal judgments entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of attempted murder, aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon, two counts of providing false information to law enforcement, burglary, and theft of property are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7). |
State v. Schuh
2022 ND 55 Highlight: A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of attempted murder is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). |